222
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

A federal judge on Friday ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt immigration raids in Los Angeles and several other counties in California, after ruling in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union's civil rights lawsuit. 

"As required by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, Defendants shall be enjoined from conducting detentive stops in this District unless the agent or officer has reasonable suspicion that the person to be stopped is within the United States in violation of U.S. immigration law," U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong wrote in her ruling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

IIRC, border agents do have some expanded authority within a certain distance of the border, and that might affect some of California, but not Los Angeles.

kagis

Ahhh. Apparently water borders count. Doesn't need to be a land border.

https://apnews.com/article/immigration-enforcement-border-patrol-internal-arrests-3f37f3ad15a31f2f1b7c57def9f2c055

Agents are granted by federal law the ability to stop and question people within 100 miles (161 kilometers) of the border, including the coasts. They have heightened authority to board and search buses, trains and vessels without a warrant within the zone.

That encompasses vast swaths of the country that include about two-thirds of the U.S. population, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. Los Angeles is well within 100 miles of the Pacific Ocean.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Last I remember, airports are also treated as borders. I cannot remember if it was all airports, which Im sure it is, or just international airports. Why wouldnt it be every airport?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I think it’s just intentional but it’s still ridiculous. What percentage of people do not live within 100 miles of a border, coast, or international airport? The number is not large.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

What percentage of people do not live within 100 miles of a border, coast, or international airport?

Has to be in single digits.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, but they still need to have reasonable suspicion to do so. They can't just sweep an area and pick up every brown person they think might be in the country illegally. Outside of an official border crossing they need to be looking for specific individuals.

Just like police have the ability to pull over a driver, but they can't just do it because they feel like it. Without reasonable suspicion it's an illegal stop.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Agents are granted by federal law the ability to stop and question people within 100 miles (161 kilometers) of the border

They can, but nobody is required to answer any questions they ask.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Water could be considered a border to maga

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Uh oh, they might come from the sky, I guess we gotta put ICE everywhere

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You’re joking but this is more or less the law with minor exceptions. Basically everywhere near an airport is covered so it’s mostly remote areas that are not.

Edit: or maybe I misremembered? I can’t find anything on the airports.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

ICE does not need to be watching for parachuting immigrants.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

And any international airport, since they're a port of entry.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
222 points (100.0% liked)

News

30957 readers
2812 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS