88
submitted 23 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

first few paragraphs

spoilerPollster Mark Penn, a longtime adviser to the Clintons, on Wednesday described Zohran Mamdani’s victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary as a “911 moment” for the party.

In an interview on Fox News’s “America’s Newsroom,” the chairman of The Harris Poll said those who don’t want to see Mamdani win in November should target him both for his refusal to condemn calls to “globalize the intifada” and for his far-left economic policies.

“Look, this is a 911 moment for the Democratic Party, in the sense that he’s an antisemitic socialist,” Penn said, when asked which angle would be more effective to use against him.

“I think you have to throw both of those things at him because he has really not disavowed the global intifada. He has not really disavowed his comments that we should seize the means of production,” Penn continued.

“He is perhaps the most extreme major candidate ever to win such a major office,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 56 points 21 hours ago

this is a 911 moment for the Democratic Party

sicko-wistful

[-] [email protected] 48 points 21 hours ago

You're the CEO of a polling institution. Run a poll asking "Do you support 'doing 9/11' to the Democratic Party?" you coward.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 20 hours ago

Would actually love to know how chuds respond to a forced choice question like "Who do you support more, 9/11 or the Democratic Party?"

[-] [email protected] 31 points 20 hours ago

Both leftists and chuds answering "9/11" might be the final boss of horseshoe theory.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Is everyone in this comment section doing a bit, or did that event make our brains incapable of ever again that sequence of digits as "nine one one" (the phone number)?

I'm genuinely curious, because, I admit, I immediately see "nine eleven" until I read more closely, so I assume others must be making the same error.

Edit: I guess this question should have been directed to @[email protected] and @[email protected]

[-] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago

In my case it's not clicking past the headline, mea culpa

I've just been peeved by comments from Gillibrand and the Republicans earlier this week so I jumped the gun.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The sentence also makes complete sense by both interpretations, because nine-eleven was an emergency.

All nine-elevens are nine-one-ones, but not all nine-one-ones are nine-elevens.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago

Sure, from your comment I had thought there was some audio making me look like a fool (still didn't click past the headline to check obv)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I didn't see any audio or video in the article. He could very well have said "9/11" and the authors left out the forward slash by mistake or thinking it unnecessary.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

Porsche's legendary car model, the Nine Eleven.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Popular 1990s TV show, rescue nine eleven

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I mean, that is how most people say Porsche 911

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Is is really that common? I’ve definitely heard both “nine eleven” and “nine one one”, but I thought the latter was still the more commonly accepted way of saying it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That's my impression and I know a lot of car guys. I suppose it depends on the language of course, but in english, norwegian, swedish definitely "nine eleven"

[-] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago

Until you pointed it out I had kinda forgotten about 911 as the emergency number

[-] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Curious, isn't it? I even hear people say "call nine eleven" aloud when speaking about the emergency number. The original pronunciation has been erased.

If I had schizophrenia I would definitely be weaving something about that being the real goal of 9/11 from the start. pepe-silvia

I remember people wondering on that day whether the "terrorists" chose the date on purpose.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Don't think that's self-referential enough for schizophrenia, which is actually pretty different from your usual conspiracy-brained nonsense.

(I don't know why I'm commenting on this.)

load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22150 readers
196 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS