496
submitted 10 months ago by FelixCress@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 127 points 10 months ago

They had to mute the booing but they "win" televote. Mossad have been busy tonight.

[-] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

It doesn't need any organisation; there are plenty of right wing apologists and zealots who are motivated enough to vote. People can't really vote "against" Israel so it'd be very easy to distort the vote if even a minority of people are focused enough to vote for one country. Israel's song wasn't terrible but it was pretty bland ballad and the televote result was patently ludicrous. But also none of the other songs were that great this year which would make it even easier for a concerted effort to win the televote.

Extreme example in the other direction is when Ukraine won in 2022. The song wasn't particularly good but Europe coalesced around voting for Ukraine. Even the Jury voting that year was distorted in Ukraine's favour. It didn't need any organisation.

[-] Iceman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yup. Generally big fans of eurovision spread out their votes between their a couple of their favorite songs. Normal viewers give maybe one vote only. Zealots put the max 20 votes on israel from the moment the voting is opened and don't even look at the show.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 28 points 10 months ago

They were the head sponsor with 'morrocan' oil, which is a Israeli company.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago

Also, "voting" in Eurovision is nothing more than maxing out a credit card. A vote doesn't represent a person but the amount of money they are willing to spend on their "non political" song festival.

Israel was also buying advertisements for people to vote for Israel despite it being illegal to do so.

[-] SilverCode@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Wow, that just makes the most recent Doctor Who episode all the more poignant

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 points 10 months ago

As a non-whovian , could you summarize it?

[-] SilverCode@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago

Some song contest (Eurovision) had gotten so big it was a galactic event. The sponsoring company had invaded one of the planets, stolen their resources (a honey flavored flower) to make a what I think was a cereal, then set fire to the planet to destroy the farms so no one else could get access to the resource.

The singing competition then banned residents of the planet from entering the competition so they didn't have a galactic stage to speak about the sponsors shitty actions.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

So it has nothing to do with an occupying invader burning down centuries-old olive trees in between bombing breaks. /s

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Username checks out. Guy knows his space produce.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Sounds like Doctor Who had some very direct inspiration.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
496 points (97.5% liked)

News

36867 readers
2567 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS