this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22988 readers
458 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mine is that some people don't consider viruses alive. These people are fucking stupid because giruses exist as do virophages. Like yes unalive things literally hunting other unalive things totally makes sense.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No. Modern biology likes to classify groups based on ancestry. Any grouping which was based on a common ancestor of all known lizard species would also include snakes. Therefore, "lizard" is invalid in that sense, and only used informally.

Same with "reptile," since birds also descend from the most recent common ancestor of all reptile species.

This is really hard to explain without a picture.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I like to think about how birds are dinosaurs and then watch a cute smol bird bouncing and dancing around and then think about how dinosaurs were probably really cute