What do you think of the ruling today that AI art can't be copyrighted? (www.reuters.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Makes sense to me. I can't just make a collage of randomly pasted copyrighted images and copyright the collage. Why should AI get to do the same thing just because it's not human?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Pretty sure you can copyright the collage, but that's more transformative and contains not intent than any ai

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago

Good news: Generative AI doesn't do that, either.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025

10 points (85.7% liked)

AskUSA

583 readers

49 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

[email protected] - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
[email protected] - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

Be nice or gtfo
Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

Related communities

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]