this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22881 readers
344 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
USAID's work in South Africa was an attempt to paper over the obviously communist and worker led anti-apartheid movement and take undue credit for ending apartheid. If you look it up, defenders of USAID love to say that they "laid the groundwork for ending apartheid" and "were an important part of ending apartheid" which is obviously just racist nonsense. No amount of US support or opposition would have been needed to ensure success or hinder the movement, it was an African movement by and for Africans whose time had come.
As you can tell, their role in being "anti-apartheid" was in line with their soft power goals and typical scope of work, but in this case since it was clear that they weren't going to get their people in charge, they had to look like they were in the right side in order to legitimate themselves to the anti-apartheid movement that would be taking power.
Thanks for this detail. So much of the info I came across fits within this, where there is a big deal made out of the Reagan veto being overturned, Bush senior 'changing course from Reagan', etc. But when I skimmed the wiki page, I didn't even see a reference to US being any significant force in ending the apartheid regime.