this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
580 points (82.4% liked)

memes

10905 readers
3374 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
580
POV: It's January 19th (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
278 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The first one is NCRI and the second one is paywalled.

NCRI is known for hit songs like -

Colleges that deplatform conservatives are anti-semitic;

DEI causes violence, and my favorite;

Luigi Mangione's support means the left are digital insurgents

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

The paper referenced gives an overview of its methodology and its data.

The three 'hit songs' you cite appear to actually be:

  1. Foreign funding decreases democracy and increases antisemitism in universities

  2. Some DEI programs are instituted in a counterproductive way

and

  1. Glorification of Luigi Mangione could result in a feedback loop of violence like 4chan did with the alt-right (I agree, but I don't see it as necessarily a bad thing)

Use https://12ft.io/ to bypass the paywall if you're interested in past discourse on the matter.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Lol, fair play, I editorialized the titles too. But really once you click into them it's super obvious these guys have an axe to grind. For example, (from the relevant paper) they state that serving up less Anti CCP content is a bias. But they compare it to YouTube and Instagram. Two services pretty famous for taking people down far right tracks if you let their algorithm auto play. So in this case even a neutral position is going to have less Anti-CCP propaganda.

And the entire paper is flawed in this way. The baseline they establish is itself flawed. They also claim causation but can only show correlation with their skewed baseline.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Yea, they were comparing tiktok to other american-owned social media sites, which are guilty of exactly the same thing themselves.

Any site that doesn't explicitly push anti chinese content is going to look like a pro-chinese bias