this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22816 readers
213 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some people say it naturally looks uncanny for them, but it doesn't happen to me, I can't really spot them... One trick to try is counting the fingers, but what else can I do?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i think the easiest thing is inconsistencies. easiest way to spot that would be if something is drawn multiple times, it's drawn differently. i've seen eye highlights be drawn completely differently in each eye, for example. check elements that are repeated a lot in the background in places that aren't attached.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

elements that are repeated a lot in the background in places that aren't attached.

Would the background "forest" in this "AI"-generated image be an example of this? The one that I circled in green. It looks oddly repetitive, I don't think natural forests are this regular...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Ah my advice was mostly for digital drawing stuff as that's what I look at most often, oops

I think in this I'm drawn to the buildings and snow. they kind of look like they're bleeding into each other and aren't as rigid as they should be. but yea, the trees definetly look off. to get that sorta blur you'd have to blur the background or have a camera's focal length set to... whatever i don't know shit about cameras. that happens in photography of landscapes a lot, but doesn't make sense to be right next to something that isn't blurred at all.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Oh, and now that you point it out, you're right, some of the buildings are curved in a way that I don't think physics support...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Advice for digital drawings is good, too (I sometimes look at digital drawings and share the ones that I liked, wouldn't want to be accidentally promoting "AI" stuff because I didn't notice), I just kinda picked the first picture that I had at hand for practice

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

That image is all kinds of fucked up. Like there are serious alien geometries in it.