this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
464 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

60047 readers
2798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 days ago (12 children)

Could bluesky have won over Mastodon because of the fediverse barrier where people doesn't know which server to choose?

[–] [email protected] 96 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Bluesky is being run by a funded professional startup team and is aimed at the masses. Mastodon is run by activists and software devs and brings in other like minded folks.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Bluesky has an advertising budget. Bluesky has an entire team just working on User Interface.

The fact that people are so lazy that they keep going for the corporate-sure-to-enshittify options shows how little people actually care about escaping corporate control of their lives.

"It's not my job to contribute to a community project" is just another way to say "it's not my job to make the world a better place."

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

It's generally easier for the layperson to pay a gym membership than it is to have the upfront cost of a barbell set and coordinating a schedule with their neighbor who owns a treadmill.

I don't want to sound too pro-corporate, I just don't want to fault others when they fall for the veneer of a "cohesive product." It takes a lot of work to organize a community project and why it's so special when they do come together.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

The fact that people are so lazy that they keep going for the corporate-sure-to-enshittify options shows how little people actually care about escaping corporate control of their lives.

It's not that deep.

People want to go where other people are. A tiny minority of them are even aware of the things that are influencing your decisions. Not a single moment is spent thinking about whether X or Y is more 'corporately controlled' before deciding to join a new platform.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Mastodon is confusing as shit though. They could have made is not as confusing, but this is what happens when you get backend only developers designing the front end of a product.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most importantly, Mastodon doesn't have the funding. It always astounds me how people miss that part.

Money lets you fix a lot of problems. Not all. But many.

Of course, it doesn't mean they'll succeed. Google+ had lots of money, too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ugh, Google+ was so much better than Facebook. The whole circles concept was a game changer for social media that no one else has really adopted in a meaningful way. Half the reason millennials began to leave Facebook was not wanting their parents seeing what they're posting, so being able to decide which group can see a particular post was an awesome idea.

Sadly it just never got the adoption

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

That concept was actually pioneered by a Diaspora (where they were called "aspects"). The strange thing was that Google kept removing functionality from the circles and making them harder to use. I think towards the end they removed them entirely.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

I use both. I've been on Mastodon for the better part of a year and only actively tried Bluesky the last couple months. My Bluesky feed is thriving, whereas Mastodon not so much. IMO this is due to Mastodon is missing the major quality of life features of Bluesky.

  • Add lists
  • Subscribable block lists
  • Custom subscribable topic feeds
  • Optional recommendation engine

These things make Bluesky very easy to get started with and more powerful even than Xitter was. It's simply a better product if you have any requirements other than federation. Getting a good feed up and running doesn't take more than an hour or two. Mastodon is a lot more work.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Subscribable block lists... I'm making an account.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah this solves a lot of problems straight off the bat. Add me, I have a few posts at the beginning of my timeline that will help you get started.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The "starter packs" of Bsky is good, too. (Maybe that's your 'add lists' though.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah it's rhe add lists

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I go over there and search for stuff, and the page is always broken. It's been like that for weeks. You only get one page of results, and then you get an error. The infinite scroll doesn't work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I just tested it in the app and it worked fine, scrolled for days with a common term like Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Weird I never noticed. For me the amount of results depends on the search term. There may just be a few items with your term. Have you tried making a feed for it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is starter packs now but not many have been made and I forgot the website that you find them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was talking about mastodon starter packs.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 days ago (4 children)
  1. That was part of the reason. I tried explaining Pixelfed to my photographer dad and he completely lost interest when I mentioned instances and equated them to e-mail providers. Non-technical people don't like having to understand a technical aspect, and the nature of federation can't be avoided.

  2. Keep in mind that these are the people who stayed on Twitter after it was infested by the musk. They're leaving because it's turned into a dogshit service, not because of any kind of moral stance. They won't choose one service over another because it's libre or decentralized or community-operated. They'll flock to one that has a low entry barrier and high population.

  3. Speaking of which: Bluesky is where the people are. The merits of a social media provider are worthless if it has a fraction of the population of a direct competitor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We should just point normal people to the biggest instance and never mention anything until they're settled in.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It is the most viable strategy, but we did that with lemmy.world and now a third of the fediverse is screeching about censorship on the largest instance and directly shitting on LW users.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

A third? Are you sure that you aren't in an echo chamber?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy world is good I barely ever see people mad about it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 6 days ago

Bluesky offers better access to the content people want with less effort. Mastodon was always going to lose that battle.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think that's a good part of it, to be honest. Plus I think also helps that Bluesky's handles look visually less confusing and unusual than the conventional double @ sign for the fediverse

@user.bsky.social vs @[email protected]

Plus other things like having starter packs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Yes, I think the main problem of Mastodon is that it looks and behaves like if engineers designed it, not designers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That’s exactly it. People are bad at tech and do not understand it. If you even give them an additional option, this may confuse a tremendous amount of people enough to simply lose interest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's the thing, though. Bluesky gives you that option, too. And you could always just sign up with the one big official Mastodon server.

IIRC, they got hammered with new users back when Mastodon was more popular, and they couldn't keep up (since every server is run on a shoestring). So, they put s moratorium on new accounts, forcing people onto other instances. That might've been what hurt adoption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not really. Bluesky has a server option, but it's filled with their main instance by default and you can just ignore it.

Mastodon, on the other hand, doesn't have a single entry point for registrations. Everything is more convoluted for the layperson.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Mastodon also has a main instance. It's mastodon.social.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Also helps it was created by Jack Dorsey.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Who's now left Bluesky which is probably for the better given his views on a lot of things

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Agreed. Twitter was still a shitshow, when he sold it. Just not as bad as now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I don't know how many not tech savvy people know this, but it helps too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its also able to pay for advertising and marketing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Through influencers and social media marketing yes. Through running ads I don't think so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Do you honestly believe that they don't?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

I think it was mostly that Mastodon wouldn't send referer headers.

So when people look at where their traffic comes from, 50% would be unknown, 20% would be Twitter, 10% would be Bluesky, and most importantly, Mastodon would never show on that report.

(Numbers made up and inaccurate.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Now someone have to write a server to federate to Bluesky, if for nothing more, as a reality check.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Bridgy Fed exists to act as a bridge between AP and ATProto/blue sky if you want to use ATProto from Mastodon. Sadly, though, the bluesky user has to also follow the bridge for you to be able to see their posts from mastodon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can choose a different server on Bluesky, too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Can you? I thought you could in theory, but it was all one server, theirs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I joined Mastodon and it sucked, I didnt know where I was or what the significance of it was. Not a fan, lemmy is similar but seems to have less compartmentalisation relative to youe server.