you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 96 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Bluesky is being run by a funded professional startup team and is aimed at the masses. Mastodon is run by activists and software devs and brings in other like minded folks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Bluesky has an advertising budget. Bluesky has an entire team just working on User Interface.

    The fact that people are so lazy that they keep going for the corporate-sure-to-enshittify options shows how little people actually care about escaping corporate control of their lives.

    "It's not my job to contribute to a community project" is just another way to say "it's not my job to make the world a better place."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    It's generally easier for the layperson to pay a gym membership than it is to have the upfront cost of a barbell set and coordinating a schedule with their neighbor who owns a treadmill.

    I don't want to sound too pro-corporate, I just don't want to fault others when they fall for the veneer of a "cohesive product." It takes a lot of work to organize a community project and why it's so special when they do come together.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    The fact that people are so lazy that they keep going for the corporate-sure-to-enshittify options shows how little people actually care about escaping corporate control of their lives.

    It's not that deep.

    People want to go where other people are. A tiny minority of them are even aware of the things that are influencing your decisions. Not a single moment is spent thinking about whether X or Y is more 'corporately controlled' before deciding to join a new platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Most importantly, Mastodon doesn't have the funding. It always astounds me how people miss that part.

    Money lets you fix a lot of problems. Not all. But many.

    Of course, it doesn't mean they'll succeed. Google+ had lots of money, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ugh, Google+ was so much better than Facebook. The whole circles concept was a game changer for social media that no one else has really adopted in a meaningful way. Half the reason millennials began to leave Facebook was not wanting their parents seeing what they're posting, so being able to decide which group can see a particular post was an awesome idea.

    Sadly it just never got the adoption

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    That concept was actually pioneered by a Diaspora (where they were called "aspects"). The strange thing was that Google kept removing functionality from the circles and making them harder to use. I think towards the end they removed them entirely.

  • source
  • parent