this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
1231 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1934 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 131 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

As soon as the algorithm become engagement based, instead of “positive reaction” based,

ie. algorithms now promote a post by how many reactions it has recieved, even if these reactions are negative, when it used to promote posts based on positive reaction.

So now ragebait dominates most social media algorithms.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it's precisely why I stopped using every social media except the fediverse. It was toxic to my mental health.

I feel safe assuming it's been similarly toxic to everyone else's, just some people haven't zeroed in on that being the problem.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

Even Lemmy was like this. Especially with the default comment sort “active”, which promotes comments that lead to arguments. My experience has been better since I switched to “top”.

I still haven’t found a good post sort that works for me. “Hot” and “Scaled” literally only promote stuff posted in the past two hours. “Top” is kinda sad because you always see posts 1 day old, and “Active” has the negative engagement problem.

The best solution I’ve found is be on an instance with downvotes disabled and sort by “active” but it isn’t perfect.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I usually go by top of the last 6 hours and top of the last 12 hours. is that just a thing in my app?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

No its built in and across all the apps.

Thats my preference as well (top 6/12). Thats for all though, subscribed I go new. But its pretty niche communities and not a huge amount of activity.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

I just sort by newest over 12/24 hours. I've found I tend to argue much less with idiots if I get in and out before the troublemakers show up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

I feel the same way and now typically use "Top 6 Hours"

...which is a actually how I found this thread.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I just subscribe to communities I like, then sort by "New" to read those "Subscribed" communities. When I run out, I change to "Scaled" and "All".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I always sort by New and let the chaos chips fall where they may

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks for the tips. I'm going to play around with it. Mine is set to hot currently, but maybe that's not my cuppa.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

maybe we should be able to blend several of these like i'll take 20% of top day and 30% of active and 5% controversial.. lemmy would grow more of the content was more suitable.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

algorithms now promote a post by how many reactions it has recieved, even if these reactions are negative

ESPECIALLY if those reactions are negative. Rage and fear are THE top engagement drivers and engagement means retention means ad impressions means dollars.

That it also means the end of democracy is immaterial to the billionaire ghouls in charge, of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It wouldn't be hard to enact laws regulating how algorithms are allowed to use views, reactions and downvotes. Metrics like "Controversial" and Reddit's "Hot" (that sums upvotes and downvotes like they're all the same) would be forbidden and governments could demand deactivation of metrics, algorithms or even the entire platform.

Of course such "anti-ragebait" regulations wouldn't fix the issue but I believe it would significantly mitigate the overall state of nowadays internet.