this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
1696 points (95.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

6024 readers
1936 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Isn't one the issues with hydrogen motors that they are a bit explodey? Genuine question, haven't looked into it in a long time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pure hydrogen doesn't explode. It's only if you mix it with oxygen. The Hindenberg glowed red not blue

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good thing there's no oxygen around then. Petrol doesn't burn without oxygen either, but it's still dangerous. Additionally typical fuel cell hydrogen cars, store the hydrogen in tanks up to 10,000 psi, which is where the explosion part happens.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Agreed. Petrol cars are also explodey. As are EVs. In fact most energy dense objects are explodey.

The issue with the 10000 psi tanks are the size and weight. Not the explodeyness.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Another huge expensive problem is transporting it is not easy. At room at atmospheric pressure and temperature, it takes up like 2-3 grams per gallon of space, making it super inefficient to transport.

You could pressurize it, but that makes it insanely flammable and a risk of it leaks. You could also cryo-freeze it, but that is also very expensive to transport, it require a lot of energy to freeze it, maintain it during long transports, and to unfreeze it at it's destination.

Building a hydrogen delivery infrastructure is probably the best way to overcome this, but that would also take years and billions.

I'm no expert on the field, but I'd imagine a lot of energy departments would rather do that cost and effort towards building new green energy plants that can deliver power to grids rather than only help cars. Car-wise, most things are transitioning to hybrid or electric anyways, so they also benefit from a green power plant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The only way I've seen hydrogen make sense is where it's made and stored on site for later grid level generation. Transporting it makes very little sense for all the reasons you mentioned. Salt concerns and ammonia have both been discussed as potential storage options. But you wouldn't move it around. Store it in a fixed location and generate the electricity on site. If you don't have to move it, hydrogen might make some sense.

https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3062