1507
He will weep. (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I said cis wasn't a medical condition, not term. There is no need for an alternative because I see no issue with it.

I don’t think it’s possible for “cis” to become an insult, because it doesn’t describe a medical condition.

I already said it can't be an insult. I was referring to "obese" as possible to use to be hurtful.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

I said cis wasn't a medical condition, not term

Why... why would you lie so blatantly something that can be so easily checked?

You, literally in the previous comment:

My comment was solely about using "it's a medical term" as a defense, not about "cis."

It is a medical term. A sometimes necessary one.

Calling someone obese isn't hurtful because of the word, it's hurtful because it's a reminder to an obese person that they're obese, which most obese people are aware is something you should strive not to be, because it's unhealthy.

Not being transgender is hurtful to Elon or some similar minded people? (Great minds think alike, but fools rarely differ.) Having your gender be congruent with the sex you were born into is hurtful to these people?

My my, I'd have thought Elon isn't actually that jealous that he's not transgendered, what with all the transhate he posts.

So... in what sort of situation could it be hurtful and to whom? And if it isn't, or can't even be, then what are we arguing over?

There's no alternative to "cis" in this context. It's literally just because dumb conservatives feel xenophobia towards a simple word like "cis". If we called people "straightgendered", I'm sure the people who are now "offended" over "cisgender" would be waving flags saying "proud straight-o-gender" or some such bs.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Let me try to untangle this.

You said:

It’s as much a descriptor as “obese”. Some people are calling for that to be slur, but it’s not, it’s a medical term.

Implying that if something is a medical term, it cannot be a slur. This is patently untrue, as evidenced by the medical terms I mentioned that very much became slurs after being widely used as insults.

That's it. I wasn't intending to touch on "cis" in this context, just the idea that something being a medical term meant it could not be a slur. Apparently I shouldn't have muddied the waters by talking about "cis" afterwards. I was attempting to explain why it wasn't the same as a term like "obese."

Cis is fine. I've said this three times now, so please stop acting like I've said otherwise.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

Implying that if something is a medical term, it cannot be a slur. This is patently untrue, as evidenced by the medical terms I mentioned that very much became slurs after being widely used as insults.

First off, no, I didn't imply that just because something is a medical term, it can't be used as an insult. If I said I assume you've had a lobotomy, it'd be offensive. However... we don't really do lobotomies anymore, do we? you mean that a lot of things that used to be medical terms are nowadays used as slurs. We also don't call people the r-word. Of course you can insult someone by asking condescendingly if they have a learning disability, but again, that implies a disability, just like "obese" implies an unhealthy medical condition. Who and in what kind of situation would consider "cisgender" offensive?

When we are using accurate, up-to-date medical terms, they aren't in an of themselves offensive. Most things can be made offensive through context, and it's easy to see how mocking someone's intelligence or implying they've "chosen" to be unhealthy (by having a bad diet or not exercising or something that is usually implied with fat insults), but I personally can't see a context in which "cisgender" could be offensive to anyone. As I've said, perhaps it's just my imagination. Perhaps you know some situations or contexts in which it could be offensive? I've asked this a few times now, and this isn't the first time I'm asking it on Lemmy. Seems to me that the people who are saying that "cis can be used as an insult" don't seem to be able to give an example of how.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh yeah, reply to me demanding I've implied something I haven't and then tell me I'm sealioning, yes, sure.

So you've missed the point of my original comment and then went on to post several comments where you literally even contradict yourself. It's okay if you missed the meaning of my point, no need to reply.

I can't imagine any scenario in which someone would be offended over the term "cisgendered". Can you? Or are you still on about how you think I implied medical terms can't be insults, which I never did? "Obese" is a current, up to date medical term. It can be offensive to people, because of the reasons I've explained several times, but there's no alternative word for the medical term. Doctor's won't go around calling someone "a bit big-boned". You can use those euphemisms in real life, as there's no need to call someone obese when there are euphemisms available. I could easily list out dozens of euphemisms for obese, although those also usually apply to all sort of overweight. I can't even think up a euphemism for "cisgender".

So EVEN IF there were a context in which someone finds "cisgender" to be offensive (which I think there isn't), because there's no folksy alternative to it, unlike with "obese", which again, sometimes has to be used as a medical term to specify a specific thing, for which euphemisms just don't do.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
1507 points (97.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10849 readers
1998 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS