this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
139 points (100.0% liked)

news

23532 readers
628 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image is of protestors in Mexico City battling police and the barriers they erected, after protestors threw Molotovs at the Israeli embassy.

Much of the preamble has been sourced from Michael Roberts' recent analysis of Mexico.


Claudia Sheinbaum, part of the left-wing and populist Morena party to which AMLO also belongs, is now the first woman to ascend to the Mexican presidency. She is also a climate/energy scientist and was previously mayor of Mexico City. Results indicate that she has won with approximately 60% of the vote, which would be the highest vote percentage in Mexican history.

AMLO's presidency has been generally successful. He campaigned on reducing violence inside Mexico, and while this has technically occurred if measured from 2018, homicides are still considerably higher than in 2010. This is largely due to warring drug cartels, which are more reflective of the United States and its rise in drug addiction and thus imports from Mexico. He also campaigned on reducing corruption, which he also kinda has, and also on reducing income inequality, which he also kinda has. The overall figures don't show massive budges in income inequality, but the minimum wage has risen by 82% and manufacturing wage have risen 27%, and this plus other social programs has lifted 9 million Mexicans out of extreme poverty - a good achievement - but not much further than that, with poverty rates still above the Latin American average. Unemployment is officially at record lows, but much of this job growth has been in the informal sector.

The Mexican economy suffered greatly during the pandemic, and while growth since then has been pretty decent, the economy is still below where it was in 2018. As Mexican capitalists do not pay much in taxes, AMLO's programs have required large budget deficits and borrowing. These capitalists are, of course, not doing many productive investments and thus there is not much productivity growth; productivity has been more-or-less stagnant for two decades. The reason why Mexican capitalists are not investing is because of the major decline in profitability since the 1990s - there is no reason to invest if your money is at major risk of not making a profit. Therefore, they have followed the trend of other national capitalists of investing in real estate and speculation, particularly in American companies.

Since NAFTA/USMCA, Mexico has become increasingly dependent on the United States for a location for its exports, while the US has exploited cheap labour in Mexico. Additionally, with the anti-Chinese sanctions increasingly put in place by the US, Mexico has become one of several conduits for China to redirect its goods so that they can still reach American markets. This has allowed Mexico to have an essentially balanced trade account and keep the peso relatively strong against the dollar.

Mexico's limited fortunes will likely decline from here as the US economy continues to slow. If Trump is elected, he may decree protectionist policies which will hit a US-reliant Mexico quite hard. Additionally, industrial production has recently declined and retail spending is also down. AMLO's presidency was genuinely beneficial for the poorest 50%, but the policies he created failed to really change the fundamentals of the economy. He relied on the private sector rather than the public sector. This is not entirely his fault - if he had tried to do anything terribly transformative, Mexico would have probably been hit hard with consequences by the US and simultaneously faced a domestic revolt by Mexican capitalists. There were and are already threats of outright invasion in response to the limited things AMLO has already done.

In an increasingly multipolar future in which America becomes weaker and weaker, it's very possible that Mexico's reliance on the US will decrease, allowing parties to be more radical without facing the possibility of facing crippling sanctions like Venezuela. However, Mexico's sheer proximity to the US means that they might be among the last countries to break free of American influence, as the US will continue to bitterly resist any attempt to break down the Monroe Doctrine long after it loses Asia, Europe, and Africa. So, it seems likely that Sheinbaum may soon find herself in a situation where she is forced by capitalists to implement fiscal austerity regardless of her intentions, which is equivalent to a declaration of war on the working class. What happens then is anybody's guess.


The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.

The Country of the Week is Mexico! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful. Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 70 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Nobody seems to have brought this up here yet but GME is having another moment in the spotlight, the original dude that got called up to congress (Roaring Kitty / DeepFuckingValue) is back posting his daily positions, this time on /r/superstonk. His story is honestly impressive, dude has gone from a $50k initial amount of money to $200+million now.

Anyway I'm bringing this up because shit might actually pop off again and, if anyone recalls last time, it caused a marketwide liquidity crisis that nearly brought down the entire market.

I think it's worth keeping an eye on, if it turns into another squeeze it's going to cause whacky shit across the market again. I'm not really convinced it will but it's a possibility on the table.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Anyone who buys now is a bag holder. Do not throw away your money

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

But like, who would they be squeezing? Are there people with over-leveraged short selling again? I doubt the hedge funds would do that again on GME specifically.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 5 months ago

I mean, hedge fund managers aren’t exactly brain geniuses. They’re coked up rich kids

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 months ago (3 children)

A lot of the hedge funds never exited. There is an unfathomable amount of fuckery surrounding GME.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

As long as that info isn't coming from the people who believe in the "ultimate" short squeeze like it's the second coming of Jesus.

The short squeeze already happened, and there have been several GME low points in which they could have exited with modest losses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Most shorts did not squeeze in 2021. That was a delta squeeze. Short volume remained high for quite a long while after that spike, though I stopped following at some point, so It's quite possible they sold off duting the long, slow decline.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The short squeeze would have been the financial “2nd coming of Jesus” in that it would have broken the entire system if they didn’t step in and interfere to stop it illegally

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's very difficult for me to accept any analysis that happens to line up with the conclusions of the subreddit that is obviously going through the symptoms of riding an economic bubble.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The bubble was in a positive feedback loop sucking up all liquidity on the market. This wasn’t a normal “bubble” as it was a never before seen phenomena and completely unprecedented. They had to literally pause trading and force the bubble to pop through illegal manipulation to stop it. Left unchecked it would have crashed the entire market.

Again, your “analysis” is just what CNN and Wall Street puked up for you to repeat and is equally dubious

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is all you need in order to understand the fuckery. The specific mechanics are less relevant than the general dynamics of a market bubble.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

GME does not look like that This is at a 5 year scale and the prior trend was like 2-5 dollars with little volitility

The initial takeoff matches, the blow off second hump matches, and the capitulation appears to happen at first, but then it bounces at a high level for like a year, with a drop and level happening periodically for the next 5. I agree that the specific fuckery doesnt matter because it's beyond your control, but the usual bubble template fails to describe what has happened.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Except this doesn’t apply at all because this is a linear speculative bubble and completely unrelated to a short squeeze, which extracts money not from other GME buyers/sellers but from the hedge funds shorting the positions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And yet the hodlers reacted in the same way that people in a market bubble do, including going into denial after it didn't go to infinity or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

You are just going purely off vibes and mainstream narrative and not any type of facts about the actual situation

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Guys smart, buys calls, posts to reddit, and the weirdos make him $50m lol. Logical and meritocratic economic system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There is no reason to believe its retail actualy buying this like the first time as its not 2020, people already lost their money the first time and inflation fucked with everyone's disposable income etc. Of course there is some but this time I think its just the usual hedge algos reacting to "sentiment" analysis i.e media reports, news, social media etc. That and of course the fact the ridiculously high IV means there is definitely some ridiculous hedging that must be done constantly and that leads to this loop too.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago (2 children)

if i was him instead of going back to doing market manipulation (noting that he nearly didn't get away with it the first time), i would just sell my account to someone

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the first time wasn't actually market manipulation and the research behind it was solid if you followed along months before it got viral

after it did though, info got super messy and few people understood what actually happened

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i used to keep an eye on r/wallstreetbets just to see what was going on in the seedy underbelly. then i ignored it for years. luck would have it i started paying attention again early in the GME squeeze. just regret i didn't risk more $ but it was a wild ride.

still think it's fucked that a cult was basically created in the wake of the actual real event

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yea it definitely broke a ton of people's brains and it sucks that happened because they totally did illegally stop the squeeze from fully realizing

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

oh i know. it was so harrowing because i couldn't access my account from work and my partner had to hold their finger over the mouse. we held tight through the initial crash after the illegal stop.

feel bad that when we sold a day later on the second pump it was probably taking money mostly from bag holders instead of the hedge funds.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

It wasn’t market manipulation. Hedge funds were doing the manipulation and he noticed it and punished it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What’s stopping them from doing what they did last time and just blocking retail purchases until the squeeze stops?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Nothing other than Retail being smarter about what platform they're using now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Adding to what Awoo said, a lot of people went ahead and set up direct share purchases via an alternatove platform with a different set of legal guarantees. There's a lot of culty shit surrounding that (computershare, if you're wondering) but if nothing else, it's out of the hands of the same people that diassapeared the buy button on Robinhood.