this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
712 points (95.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35471 readers
386 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I dont know why they have to lie about it. At $5/8ft board you'd think I paid for the full 1.5. Edit: I mixed up nominal with actual.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 168 points 6 months ago (12 children)

Shouldn't the normal size be 2? Given, well, the name?

[–] [email protected] 172 points 6 months ago (16 children)

You'd think so, but no.
Short story is the 'nominal' size is the size before going into a planer to smooth the faces.
Yes, it makes little sense, like many things related to construction stuff.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah sorry. The tree was originally 50ft tall so we call the pieces that. But you only get 3ft

Is like buying 1200lbs steaks because that's what the cow weighs before it gets parted

[–] [email protected] 77 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Better example would be raw vs cooked weight of a 1/4lb paddy.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

Exactly. Because it is easier to weigh the correct amount before cooking than find out you were wrong after.

But you should probably be feeding Patrick more.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's a very small area to grow rice in.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Or a very offended Irish person.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And if you're a fan of quotation marks you could call it a "2"x4"."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (6 children)

You have to escape the quotes....

"2\"x4\"" or use differing quotes '2"x4"'

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

You did that on purpose, you misanthrope.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ah the infamous NaN lumber 🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The two-by-fours at your local home center are not 2 inches thick or 4 inches wide...not anymore at least. They spent several weeks at that size though. The sawmill cut them to that size to stack and kiln dry, and then when removed from the kiln they are then milled straight and square. Used to be they would sell the rough stock to carpenters who would do the milling themselves, but then they figured out that the railroads were charging them a fortune to ship a lot of wood that was going to be ground to sawdust anyway, so they started milling the boards before shipment. Same amount of construction lumber arrives at the construction site and it took less fuel for the locomotive to deliver it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (6 children)

they are then milled straight and square

Lol. Trying to find lumber that's straight and square is a pipe dream these days.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It was straight and square when it was milled. Problem is that the big box stores cut corners during the kiln drying phase, so the boards have a ton of moisture still in them. As that dries, the boards twist and cup.

Plus poor protection from the elements at each storage step, which means rapid temp changes, which also causes wood movement.

Go to a local lumber yard. They tend to do a better job at kiln drying. You're still going to have warped boards, but far fewer in my experience.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Lumber is weird because it has been industry standard to lie about dimensions since before the US existed so it’s just kinda a thing they get to do

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (5 children)

No its not Maybe in the US? At least here, it is and has to be, very precise especially when it comes to industry quality. It is precise down to the mm!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but they measure in feet and cheesburgers.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And lies, don't forget the lies

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Alternative facts, thank you very much

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

How does that work when wood varies due to moisture content? If they give precise mm measurements, only 20% of boards will meet those criteria.

All they are giving is the planned dimensions instead of nominal in mm form, it’s still not precise, it can’t be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Construction lumber, especially pressure treated lumber, is sold so wet I don't think it really matters. I've actually never tried to calculate wood movement for construction lumber because who the fuck cares? But for furniture lumber which is dried to between 6 and 14% moisture, there is a formula:

width of the board in inches x percentage of moisture change * expansion coefficient for a particular species.

Yellow pine (extremely common construction lumber) has an expansion coefficient of .00263. A 2x4 (actual dimension 1.5" by 3.5") that undergoes a 4% moisture content change will grow/shrink 3.54.00263 = 0.03682 inches, or just over 1/32". That's in width; it'll vary by less than half that in thickness. Wood basically doesn't move along the grain; the board won't get appreciably longer or shorter.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Bullshit. Wood expands and contracts so ther is no way you can be precious down to the mm.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It's not exactly a lie, just a standard. Nominal board sizes were based on the unfinished lumber size. Another 1/4 inch is taken off each side to get a smooth surface that makes it easier to work with.

Here's an old image (reddit warning)

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fexternal-preview.redd.it%2F6Oy1DmXVFs0lyKxq9OmjaI-2gsPj8QO6joLlY1rB7m4.jpg%3Fauto%3Dwebp%26s%3D4fa73a2eaf8d96d4de26378be1ba9c404b210685

that shows the rough cuts of boards from a log. When they look at a log, they determine how many of each size they can get from it, and at that point, a 2x4 is 2 inches by 4 inches.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Why does the consumer need to know the dimensions at harvest when it's been processed multiple times?

That's like calling an 4oz can of evaporated milk a gallon because it came from a gallon of milk before processing (I have no clue on the ratio)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I it’s like calling a quarter pounder a quarter pounder. You are not getting a quarter bound of burger after cooking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I agree with this. Use whatever system you need or want internally, but there's no reason to force whatever archaic or industry system onto a consumer. Logcutters also use a 1"=1/4 system and that is how they sell wood. A piece of wood that is 2" thick is sold as 8/4. Not 2". I get that they have their system but it seems dickish to force the consumer to use that system. There could be a good argument for it, but I've not heard one beyond "what, can't you do math?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

but there's no reason to force whatever archaic or industry system onto a consumer

Sure there is. Look up the concept of a “standard” if you don’t understand the reasons.

Standards only work when they don’t change

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

It’s like a 1/4lb paddy being a different weight before and after cooking. They can’t tell you the final weight, since it’s always going to be different. Same with wood.

The woods final actual dimensions can vary, so they tell you its original size.

A 2x10 can be anywhere from 9-3/8thick down do 8-3/4 depending on how it dries.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

Not entirely true. I lived in a house that was just over a century old. The framing was exactly what it said it was, a 2x4 was 2” by 4”. Same for all the structure. These were mill cut, but still pretty clean. It was WW2-ish and after that we started to get planed lumber that gave us 1.5x3.5. It wasn’t even until probably the early part of the 1900s that lumber started to become “dimensional”, as in the standard sizes we know of today.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago (10 children)

As if american measurements have ever made sense. Look up how they measure screws or wires and despair.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Or shotgun shell sizes and loads.

"It all started in 1840 when the dram was a common unit of measurement..."

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And they all had onions on their belts as was the style at the time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Five bees for a nickel.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Expect for the .410 gauge. That one is a caliber, because reasons

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (11 children)

It's a wonder they manage to build anything. They have pocket calculators dedicated to the building industry. It's surreal.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

The convention is 2" before milling. Milling takes off 1/4"on each side, so the result is 1.5".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They were when the name was made, but due to changes in the manufacturing process, they aren't anymore. The name stuck, though.

https://www.popsci.com/two-by-four-lumber-measurements-explained/

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So don’t fret. The next bundle of 2-by-4s you pick up in the hardware store are certain to be the exact same size: 1.5-by-3.5 inches.

So they can measure precisely, after all

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It's due to the milling to square it.

You can get rough cut 2x4 or 2x2 or anything that are actually that size but by the time you trim and square it you will end up at the measurements sold in big box stores

Edit: I mean the size they used to be in store, not OPs version :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It was done for largely sensible reasons.

https://youtu.be/WaJFudED5FQ?si=7j005FmfJVr_JQL_

In short, a 2x4 was originally 2x4 inches, full stop, but it was found that this size wasn't necessary for the strength being applied to them in construction. We were wasting lumber for no reason. They went through a few cycles of sizing down as the actual needed strength was understood better. The naming convention stuck, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)