Proof in what exact way you were afraid, confused or frightened. Did you fear bodily harm? What made you think that? Did the intruder move to attack you? Did they notice you?

The law is written such that you need to prove innocence, that is, the existence of these effects. If you cannot prove you felt this way you are guilty.

as any reasonable person in this situation would

That is not sufficient. It is always scary to be put into a situation where the need to self defence arises. You must prove your terror was exceptional.

According to law student material of a university:

The asthenic affect [confusion, fear fright] must be of such severity that the perpetrator is able to process the events only to a significantly reduced extent.

https://www.uni-potsdam.de/de/rechtskunde-online/rechtsgebiete/strafrecht/entschuldigungsgruende/notwehrexzess-33-stgb

You're absolutely right, liberation is when queer people are criminalized at the wishes of other neocolonial power rather than established neocolonial power.

The workers are finally free to get rid of the bourgeoisie degenerates that were invented by the West to destabilize the nation.

Niger is literally the very first country in the world to criminalize asexuality. It couldn't have been normally ignored at any prior point in history.

Besides, this is more about Niger tightening relations with Russia. Part of their military agreement is aligning society with "Russian values".

No country on this planet is interested in regular colonialism anymore by the way. It's all neocolonialism which in this specific case is fairly obvious Russian neocolonialism. Western neocolonialism occurs in other African countries.

In Germany it's literally illegal to sleep with a gun under your pillow as you are violating gun storage laws. This already makes your claim to self defense very murky. Because why are you breaking the law in the first place?

It could be argued you intended in advance to shoot whoever entered your home which would then constitute murder.

§ 34 StGB Justifiable Emergency.

Anyone who, in the face of an imminent and unavoidable danger to life, physical integrity, liberty, honor, property, or another legally protected interest, commits an act to avert the danger from themselves or another person does not act unlawfully if, upon weighing the conflicting interests—namely, the legally protected interests involved and the degree of danger threatening them—the protected interest substantially outweighs the interest that is impaired. This applies, however, only to the extent that the act is a reasonable means of averting the danger.

The right to personal property never substantially outweighs the interest of another person to stay alive. You must be (about to be) attacked to be able to resort to a gun.

Moment:

Letztes Jahr:

• Farbwalzen vom Laserdrucker nicht anfassen
• Keine Pappe in den Drucker reinmachen

Dieses Jahr:

• Digitales Gruppenbuch
• Linux

Nächstes Jahr:

• Beitritt des Kindergartens zum CCC (?)

Zumindest extrapolier ich mal so, würde zum Fortschritt passen.

Verlangt die Bahn dann eigentlich Entschädigung? Also nicht für die kaputte Lok, das muss die KFZ-Versicherug vermutlich blechen, aber für den Schaden durch verspätete, nachfolgende Züge?

I don't think you understand how different Android and Linux distributions truly are.

Linux alone refers to the kernel. There are custom AOSP kernels based on the Linux LTS versions with a few extra patches but that is basically all that connects Linux to Android.

But absolutely everything in userland is wholly diifferent in Android than with any Linux distribution out there.

And you can't just replicate what Android did on top of the Linux kernel without Google amounts of resources. Which GrapheneOS does not have in the slightest.

JE

If we want to go into technicalities:

The internationally accepted definition of what constitutes a genocide is quite limited and certainly not identical to what is colloquially interpreted as genocide. The same way murder is distinct from manslaughter.

Serbia was found not guilty of committing genocide by the ICJ in the Yugoslav wars for instance. Serbia did commit various crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing (primarily by way of deportation) but this was not found to be genocide.

Most scholars believe genocide (as defined under the Genocide Convention) refers exclusively the "physical-biological destruction of a protected group".

Just look at a couple excerpts from this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_genocide

In the case of Prosecutor v. Krstić (2 August 2001), the ICTY ruled "customary international law limits the definition of genocide to those acts seeking the physical or biological destruction of all or part of the group. Hence, an enterprise attacking only the cultural or sociological characteristics of a human group in order to annihilate these elements which give to that group its own identity distinct from the rest of the community would not fall under the definition of genocide".

On 14 January 2000, the ICTY ruled in the Prosecutor v. Kupreškić and Others case that the Lašva Valley ethnic cleansing campaign in order to expel the Bosnian Muslim population from the region was persecution, not genocide per se.

Though under some nation's law, such as Germany, the definition of genocide is more broad:

However, the ECHR highlighted that the German court's ruling, based upon German domestic law, had interpreted the crime of genocide more broadly than and in a manner since rejected by international courts.[52] Under the wider definition that the German judiciary upheld, the ethnic cleansing carried out by Jorgić was a genocide because it was an intent to destroy the group as a social unit, and although the majority of scholars took the view that German genocide law should interpret genocide as the physical-biological destruction of the protected group, "a considerable number of scholars were of the opinion that the notion of destruction of a group as such, in its literal meaning, was wider than a physical-biological extermination and also encompassed the destruction of a group as a social unit"

Tl;dr: It's only genocide when it comes from the genocide region, else it's just sparkling ethnic cleansing.

That's quite the... "friendly" translation. I'd translate it as "polish your fucking mouth" instead.

You will likely get your mouth polished if you call someone's mouth a "Fresse".

Und was bedeutet das für Hessen?

Yeah, that's an issue. Though that is also significantly less trustworthy since it only proves possession of an ID, not ownership. Afaik this method is therefore legally insufficient for platforms that need to know their customer (banks, stock exchanges etc.).