swlabr

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (15 children)

If I were to guess (shoot me if I’m mansplaining) he’s suggesting we use AI in cultural niches to generate content. i.e. the thing where AI doofuses think it’s cool to automate the fun parts of human experience out of our hands.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

Reading this article just made me think “man these idiots need to go to therapy” and then as I thought about what to sneer about I realised “no therapist deserves to hear about P doom”

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I dare u to tweet this at grimes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

has been happening

Yes absolutely, just now it’s A C C E L E R A T I N G

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He also seems to be mentioning his 40 years of expertise a lot more, which might be a reaction to some negative feedback. I want to dig deeper, but I don’t like the feeling that I’ll have to read generated stuff carefully.

I don’t know anything about this dude beyond what I just read on wikipedia but a guy like this spruiking AI is probably just grasping at straws as he is swept downstream away from relevancy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

As a Radiohead fan post-OKC that’s apt

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh so we’re just gonna drown in AI GIGO science now too? I guess it’s not enough that we are igniting the atmosphere.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Shit like this is why I hate nerds. (Note: am nerd, by any sensible measure.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Funny, when I ask chatgpt to draw a rationalist, the same thing pops up.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

BJ: "I don't know what the is-ought problem is, or why anyone cares. I am clearly qualified to declare it solved. First, let me google what the definition of 'is' is, and also what 'ought' is. Then I'll use some science words to hot glue the two things together, and BAM! Solved. Another win for e/acc."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

I am gonna sue you for psychological damage how dare u. Also because the version you simulated in your brain is the same as a real person u are getting sued twice for extra money. I’m gonna donate so much money to MIRI

view more: ‹ prev next ›