21 (wip)
2 meme 2 memeious
21 (wip)
2 meme 2 memeious
Understandable, have a nice day
ok disco
It took me too long to read the prompt and see that without the shortcuts, it's a single path. I wasted too much time on search algorithms.
P1: Here's what I did: Walk the path. Every time you hit a new grid, check if the two shortcuts you can take will save you 100 ps.
To calculate the shortcut saving:
If you index every grid position on the main path from 0, then it takes X ps to reach position X, The time it takes to travel from start to X, then a shortcut to Y, then from Y to the end, is X + 1 + (main path length - Y). The time saved is then just Y - X - 1, modulo maybe like 5 fence post errors.
P2. The prompt wasn't really clear about whether or not cheating meant you can only travel through one set of walls before your cheat ends, or if it meant you could just move through walls for 20ps to wherever you could reach. Turns out, it's the latter.
The above formula is then a special case of Y - X - manhattan distance(X, Y).
20: currently a WIP but:
meme
Wait, so it’s all grids?
🧑🏿🚀🔫🧑🏿🚀
Day 19! (the cuervo gold....)
disc and code
Ok so my path to this answer was circuitous and I now hate myself a little.
P1: Ok, a repeated dfs on suffixes. that shouldn't be too hard. (it was not hard)
P2: Ok, a repeated dfs is a little too slow for me, I wonder how I can speed it up?
forgets about memoisation, a thing that you can do to speed this sort of thing up
I guess the problem is I'm doing an O(mn) match (where m is the number of towels, n is the max towel length) when I can do O(n). I'll build a prefix tree!
one prefix tree later
Ok that still seems to be quite slow. What am I doing wrong?
remembers that memoisation exists
Oh I just need to memoise my dp from part 1. Oops.
Anyway posting the code because I shrunk it down to like two semicolons worth of lines.
(
List<String> input = getLines();
Set<String> ts = Set.from(input.first.split(', '));
Map<String, int> dp = {};
int dpm(String s) => dp.putIfAbsent(
s,
() => s.isNotEmpty
? ts
.where((t) => t.matchAsPrefix(s) != null)
.map((t) => dpm(s.substring(t.length)))
.fold(0, (a, b) => a + b)
: 1);
void d19(bool sub) {
print(input
.skip(2)
.map((s) => dpm(s))
.map((i) => sub
? i
: i > 0
? 1
: 0)
.reduce((a, b) => a + b));
}
gilding the lily a bit but
yes
What is this, day 16?
Does a sealion have bootlicker nature? Ugh.
Please, señor software engineer was my father. Call me Bob.
17!
p1 discussion
Simultaneously very fun and also the fucking worst.
Fun: Ooooh, I get to simulate a computer, exciting!
Worst: Literally 8 edge cases where fucking up even just one can fuck up your hour.
p2 discussion
I did this by hand. sort of. I mean I didn't code up something that found the answer.
Basically I looked at the program in the input and wrote it out, and realised that A was essentially a loop variable, where the number of iterations was the number of octal digits A would take to represent. The most significant octal digits (octits?) would determine the tail end of the output sequence, so to find the smallest A you can do a DFS starting from the MS octit. I did this by hand.
EDIT: code. Not gonna explain any of it.
class Comp {
List<int> reg;
List<int> prog;
int ip = 0;
List<int> output = [];
late List<(int, bool) Function()> ops;
int get combo => prog[ip + 1] < 4 ? prog[ip + 1] : reg[prog[ip + 1] - 4];
Comp(this.reg, this.prog) {
ops = [
() => (reg[0] = (reg[0] >> combo), false),
() => (reg[1] ^= prog[ip + 1], false),
() => (reg[1] = combo % 8, false),
() => (reg[0] != 0) ? (ip = prog[ip + 1], true) : (0, false),
() => (reg[1] ^= reg[2], false),
() {
output.add(combo % 8);
return (0, false);
},
() => (reg[1] = (reg[0] >> combo), false),
() => (reg[2] = (reg[0] >> combo), false)
];
}
compute() {
output.clear();
while (ip < prog.length) {
if (!ops[prog[ip]]().$2) {
ip += 2;
}
}
}
reset(int A) {
ip = 0;
reg[0] = A;
reg[1] = 0;
reg[2] = 0;
}
}
void d17(bool sub) {
List<String> input = getLines();
Comp c = Comp(
input.take(3).map((s) => s.split(" ").last).map(int.parse).toList(),
input.last.split(" ").last.split(",").map(int.parse).toList())
..compute();
print("Part a: ${c.output.join(",")}");
if (!sub) return;
List<int> sols = [];
bool dfs(int cur) {
bool found = false;
sols.add(cur);
int sol = sols.reduce((a, b) => 8 * a + b);
c..reset(sol)..compute();
if (c.prog
.whereIndexed((i, e) => i >= c.prog.length - c.output.length)
.foldIndexed(true, (i, p, e) => p && c.output[i] == e)) {
if (found = c.output.length == c.prog.length) {
print("Part b: $sol");
} else {
for (int i = 0; i < 8 && !(found = found || dfs(i)); i++) {}
}
}
sols.removeLast();
return found;
}
for (int a = 0; a < 8 && !dfs(a); a++) {}
}
16!
p1
I used A*, though mathematically I would have been fine with Dijkstra's. Also, here's how I remember how to spell Dijkstra: ijk is in alphabetical order.
p2
If you've implemented path/back tracking on a search algo before, this wasn't too bad, though instead of tracking best parent you need to track equivalently best parents. Woke AOC trying to normalise families with more than two parents, SMH
1.1 trillion? Good luck, chuck.