No one ever thought a University of Oklahoma "A" was the equivalent of a Swarthmore or Chicago "A" (both of which were known for being notoriously anti-grade inflation and hard, although Chicago less so these days)...

But if these are the actual grading standards at University of Oklahoma, it's the equivalent of a certificate of a stupidity. Can people answer the Calculus test questions with Bible quotes too?

Holy fucking bird brain.

I completely agree. This is all about people not enjoying life because they work too much. Regulate the problem as an externality and this problem would go away. But government leaders in Japan would never have the guts to radically regulate the problem, such as requiring double the pay for overtime after 28 hours of work per person in a week (and this would need to be per person, not per job, to avoid people then just doubling up on jobs to get more hours; the externality could only be brought under control by having it apply to everyone with no way to circumvent it).

If Japan capped working at 28 hours a week and anything after that required double the pay (for overtime), this problem would taken care of.

Working all the time makes people miserable. It's an externality that impacts society in all sorts of horrible ways. It would be proper for the government to institute a rule like this.

It would definitely lower GDP of Japan and cause some economic issues, but the alternative (living in a world where people are so miserable that they don't fall in love as much and want to reproduce) is worse for their economy.

Will they do this? No, because it would require thinking outside of the box too much and would be seen as too extreme.

Literally nothing in it is AI. It's not even an AI writing style. Where are the dashes? Where is the quirky rhetoric like "It's not a (one thing), it's a (other thing)." AI has a style, it's not this. Just because I'm verbose doesn't mean I'm an AI.

So I get what you are saying...

A few possibilities:

1. Covid and the pandemic fundamentally changed how people interact and relate

I know this is strange, but pre-covid, people grew up in a world in which dating and to some extent working required a social life. People met at bars, through friends, at parties, doing common activities. Then dating Apps and hookup Apps came along, but bars still existed, social scenes still existed, people still had parties.

Work also had to be a physical social thing: you needed to show up, there was a more social aspect to interacting with people, and people were more likely to socialize outside of work. Some remote work happened, but not a lot.

Then covid happened. All of work changed so that the infrastructure existed for most people to work without needing to be in person. No one could party, no one could go to bars, no one could do things. There also used to be a large social stigma to staying at home. If you were at home on a Friday, you were a loser, uncool, not invited to things, and it bothered people, and felt like social exclusion.

With covid, everyone stayed at home. There was no social exclusion by being at home. People worked at home. And suddenly, being social in person was so much less important. You could get a job by applying online and it didn't require a social network quite the same way, or that network could be online. You could meet someone, date, and procreate online without needing a social network at all. The main thing that mattered, in order to procreate, was whether someone had a stable job and was employable.

Even post-covid, I feel like we've had a shift. There are still parties, there are still clubs, there are still bars. They are less required or needed part of society. Not only that, we've gone into more of an era of have and have nots, and some people desperate, some people scamming others, and so there are more risks in going out of meeting someone who is problematic. It's why people prefer driverless robotaxis over regular lyfts and ubers, even when it costs more: it's not that the driver interaction is bad, it's that social interactions entail risk and if you are employed and can date using Apps, or have a partner, it's sometimes simple to avoid that.

Technology is now much more addictive. So many people, myself included, think it's emotionally healthy to go out and be around people. In the same way I know broccoli is better than candy, I know that people are better than the Internet. But when I am stressed, when I'm annoyed, when life is frustrating, what do I want? I want the Internet and candy, not hanging out and meeting new people.

possibility 2

2. People have become much more classist as inequality has increasingly risen, partly because perception of being in a lower class carries risk. When the class itself it what causes wealth to increase, people become hyper-aware of perceptions.

It's possible your friends make more money now and see themselves as better because of their careers and specifically are less responsive because of that. Should that matter in a friendship? No, but does it? Sadly, many people are extraordinarily superficial and cruel and evil. Almost all of us (that use Lemmy) use devices that contain rare earth minerals mined by the ultra-ultra poor who are essentially there in a forced labor situation because no one else will hire them and if they don't mine rare earth minerals they will die. The conditions are brutal and evil, there could even be actual slavery involved in some cases, and the supply chain is confusing enough that no one knows which devices involve slavery. That's evil. We are all evil. To those people, we're the monsters... and they aren't wrong.

So given that most people are selfish and evil and just care about their own interest, it should not be surprising that these people, if their wealth has increased, don't care about you anymore. Much like people don't stop using devices despite slavery involved in the supply chains because fundamentally people choose evil when it's easier most of the time, you shouldn't expect people making more money to want to stay in contact with you, because sadly, the only thing that matters in our corrupt evil society is money, apparently.

possibility 3

3. People are so exhausted from work that they just don't have time.

Working 40 hours a week is hard as hell. It used to be for most men they worked 40 hours, but also had a full-time assistant at home who cooked, cleaned, shopped, and did other things.

Now if someone wants a family, often both people are working, and more people are single. Wages have not kept up with inflation, so that means if you are single, you often can't afford a cleaner, a personal shopper, meals being delivered, etc.

The result is chronic exhaustion. Working Mon-Friday, being tired as hell trying to be more and more efficient, because companies have demanded more efficiency to avoid being fired without paying more, and then on your off time, you either scroll Internet to try to decompress, Saturday you just sleep nearly all day and finally have a moment to be exhausted and miserable, and Sunday you catch up on cleaning, shopping, and worry about money, and then Monday the hell starts all over again.

Your friends may be dealing with that, the whole barely treading water thing, and it's awful.

possibility 4

4. post covid issues, long covid

A lot of people who got covid developed health issues, and some aren't obvious. Some are things like, you don't quite have full on long covid, but you are just more tired all the time. You don't have chronic fatigue, but your health isn't as good. It just impacts people. People with such issues aren't quite disabled, but they aren't totally functional either. And I bet there are a ton more people like this than say so, because it's not easy to talk about, there aren't government benefits for being chronically tired after getting covid if you need to work and it's not totally debilitating, etc.

I think it's more likely Possibility 1 and 2. People are going out and partying less (no data to support this, just from going out myself and seeing bars and clubs with fewer people) and people are more classist and drop people who have less money these day. I wouldn't block these people, but don't spend any more time on them. Go completely no contact on your end. If they reach out, great, if not, who cares. They will likely not reach out and it will feel like giving up a soda you really like and you'll get cravings to reach out, but don't. A month of no contact later, you'll realize it's best to not interact with them anymore. The second month will be easier, and by the third you won't miss them much at all. Force yourself to be uncomfortable and then you'll be more likely to use meetup.com, go out to bars, do things where you are more likely to interact with new people who will be worth the time.

Men at a compound fucking my ass? I don't know what sort of paradise realm you think I live in, but my sex life is not that awesome. Sadly, you don't have to beat my face to reduce the amount of men fucking me.

You're wrong about ECT. It nearly always results in permanent memory loss and even if occasionally some patients seem "better" because they remember less of their lives, it does not negate the evil of the treatment. Worse than that, psychiatrist universally deceive patients about the risk of memory loss, saying memory loss is temporary, when most patients who have had ECT report that the memory loss is permanent. There were people who extolled the virtues of lobotomies decades ago and the procedure even won a Nobel Prize. The reason it won a Nobel Prize is because patient experiences mean nothing compared to the avarice of a psuedoscientific discipline that is always looking for the next scam, with the worst most cruel and most expensive scams always inflicted on the most vulnerable. It is hard and traumatic for patients who have been exploited by their supposed "healers" to come forward with the truth. It is incredibly psychologically agonizing to admit to being duped. Patients are not believed then or now. You are completely wrong.

The elephant in the room that no one talks about is that locked psychiatry facilities treat people so horribly and are so expensive, and psychologists and psychiatrists have such arbitrary power to detain suicidal people, that suicidal people who understand the system absolutely will not open up to professional help about feeling suicidal, lest they be locked up without a cell phone, without being able to do their job, without having access to video games, being billed tens of thousands of dollars per month that can only be discharged by bankruptcy. There is a reason why people online have warned about the risks and expenses of calling suicide hotlines like 988 that regularly attempt to geolocate and imprison people in mental health facilities, with psychiatric medications being required in order for someone to leave.

The problem isn't ChatGPT. The problem is a financially exploitative psychiatric industry with horrible financial consequences for suicidal patients and horrible degrading facilities that take away basic human dignity at exorbitant cost. The problem is vague standards that officially encourage suicidal patients to snitch on themselves for treatment with the consequence that at the professional's whim they can be subject to misery and financial exploitation. Many people who go to locked facilities come out with additional trauma and financial burdens. There are no studies about whether such facilities traumatize patients and worsen patient outcomes because no one has a financial interest in funding the studies.

The real problem is, why do suicidal people see a need to confide in ChatGPT instead of mental health professionals or 988? And the answer is because 988 and mental health professionals inflict even more pain and suffering upon people already hurting in variable randomized manner, leading to patient avoidance. (I say randomized in the sense that it is hard for a patient to predict the outcome of when this pain will be inflicted, rather than something predictable like being involuntarily held every 10 visits.) Psychiatry and psychology do everything they possibly can to look good to society (while being paid), but it doesn't help suicidal people at all who bare the suffering of their "treatments." Most suicidal patients fear being locked up and removed from society.

This is combined with the fact that although lobotomies are no longer common place, psychiatrists regularly push unethical treatments like ECT which almost always leads to permanent memory loss. Psychiatrist still lie to patients and families regarding ECT about how likely memory loss is, falsely stating memory loss is often temporary and not everyone gets it, just like they lied to patients and families about the effects of lobotomies. People in locked facilities can be pressured into ECT as part of being able to leave a facility, resulting in permanent brain damage. They were charlatans then and now, a so called "science" designed to extract money while looking good with no rigorous studies on how they damage patients.

In fact, if patients could be open about being suicidal with 988 and mental health professionals without fear of being locked up, this person would probably be alive today. ChatGPT didn't do anything other than be a friend to this person. The failure is due to the mental health industry.

Unlike with most ice agents that can't be identified, a judge can try to find out who arrested this woman by contacting the person running the airport.

The federal judge could order that the person running the airport terminal be detained and provide information to the court about which department of homeland security employees were responsible. If the person refuses to answer, the person could be arrested and held in contempt in a cell until they comply.

The federal judge could then issue an arrest for contempt of court orders for the department of homeland security officers responsible for violating the order and detain whoever deported this woman until she is brought back.

If this judge did this, it would likely be appealed immediately to the supreme court who would side with trump who would oppose it, the homeland security officers would be released, and nothing else would be done.

There is no mechanism to enforce a judicial order that protects immigrants when you have a supreme court that rubber stamps trump immigration policy.

Although this is terrible, probably 55% of the country still supports harsh immigration policies, even policies that lack process and violate judicial orders, if it gets rid of more brown people, and they have elected the most ruthless anti-immigration anti-POC people to get that done. In general, many American conventions of "process" and "rights" have been illusory in nature for a long time: people had rights if they had money, otherwise there was no enforcement mechanism. Many of the most important rights, like a right to a jury trial, can be taken away by giving people a jury trial that is unfair (no meaningful representation, no meaningful investigation, evidence withheld, a jury that only represents a certain segment of society) and even now it is mostly impossible to appeal such sham trials. Now, a person of color, even with meaningful representation, has no rights if they are Latino and they can't prove they were born inside the USA.

Imagine that poor girl's terror. She probably debated whether to stay at home and is so upset she decided to travel.

Musk is clearly a Nazi.

First, there's the Nazi salute. There's no reason to do that unless you are a Nazi.

Second, Nazis called Hitler my Furer, and he's rewriting it this way specifically for this reason. It is an honorific title and he's showing honor to Hitler.

Third, Musk deflects from accusations he's a Nazi ("that's a crazy thing to say") but he never responds by saying "What Hitler did was horrible and I'm not a Nazi and detest their ideology" which is what someone would say if not a Nazi.

The scary thing about this is Musk will soon control a large robot army. At that point, he could appoint white supremacists to lead the robot army and pick up where Hitler left off. This is a real threat for Jewish people as well as other minorities.

This is a really cool idea. Any work in the direction of more linux phone technology is always good. There are some linux phones out there already, and these devices have had some problems which is why there hasn't been more adoption. If there is a way to do this with RISC and have decent battery life, that would be really exciting. Have you tried installing Phosh on it?

The newest, and most exciting, option right now is flx1s (https://furilabs.com/flx1s-update-2/).

One of the biggest problems is that, to my knowledge, there is no standard linux mobile App standard or, if there is, it's not often used. There is a group working on this issue right now (https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/mobile-linux-standards-group-formed).

For example, if I am using mobian or something similar and download thunar using sudo apt install thunar, then if I run thunar, it will run, but certain menus won't display easily. In phosh, any sub-menu boxes will also pop up as a smaller pop-up box and to close it, you have to scroll through Apps to find the pop-up box and then close it. Generally I may be able to see the file structure on the left in Thunar but have a hard time seeing what's on the right.

There are also things that can happen in which default panels (like the side panel) take up so much room that you can't see what's going on. For instance, if you try running gimp in phosh, you can barely see the image panel by default.

There are some Apps designated as mobile-friendly but even these sometimes don't display correctly. Perhaps there should be a way to make it harder for Apps to be installed that don't meet mobile standards and have weird menu glitches, such as making it harder to download Apps from repositories that are not mobile.

I'd really like to be able to run something like "flatpak-mobile install librewolf" and just get something that at least had a file with it to tell phosh how to display menus in the best way, if not a slightly altered librewolf.

Many people who used phosh would say "well just use waydroid" but the problem is that with play integrity api, many of those Apps won't work.

In order for banking Apps and other Apps to run on linux and people to develop software, there really needs to be more adoption of mobile linux.

And yes, battery life was atrociously bad and completely unusable on the linux mobile devices I tested, which were a few years ago. It also got way too hot when just not doing anything, which was terrible. (In other words, if I took the device with me to Starbucks and got a coffee, it might get way too hot in my pocket; if I took it out and used the Internet for 20 minutes, the battery could die, and even if it didn't, if I were waiting for a call during that time there was a good chance I wouldn't get it. After getting back home, it would be totally dead and need a full recharge.)

Right now also, the main competitor to linux phones is Graphene OS with FOSS Apps and Graphene OS has better security features if someone is worried about their phone being stolen or seized. Data security is important to me and Graphene OS has a rate-limiting throttle to the password entry that even cellebrite can't easily bypass and a function to auto-reboot. If the political situation in my country deteriorated even more, and arbitrary arrests started to happen more often, I would much rather be arrested with a Graphene phone than a typical linux mobile phone. Mobile linux for certain distros such as Mobian still offers robust encryption in before first unlock (bfu) if the password can withstand brute force attempts, but since there's no hardware rate-limiter, the password has to be much more complex. Also, most people who use their phone frequently are not in BFU mode.

Graphene OS also requires a Pixel which does not have hardware switches and so a person must trust that there's no exploit allowing certain components to be turned on or off which can be concerning when there is no way to definitively measure what the cellular modem is transmitting. Call me paranoid, but given what I know about how easy it is for someone smart to exploit computers, I actually don't want a cell phone microphone to have power when I am talking about sensitive things or inputting passwords into computer systems and I do not want a camera that is built into the lcd part of the glass screen and can't be easily covered because of the need to swipe up nor turned off without a switch, even if the cell phone has an incredible operating system that is very secure. Graphene, unlike most mobile linux distributions, is mostly very usable with no battery life issues, no weird display problems where Apps don't display correctly and menus don't work correctly, and no random reliability problems, mostly. I understand not wanting to rely on anything involving Android, however, given Google's recent aggressive anti-privacy stances.

I'm excited about FuriPhone (https://furilabs.com/) and Purism's Librem 5v2.

The thing that I believe would help Mobile Linux most right now is people having conferences and getting to know each other and discussing standards, specifically on user experience, linux mobile app standards, battery life, and reliability.

There are so many smart people in mobile linux and eventually it will get great but right now there are major problems with the user experience because of how Apps are displayed and battery life as well as things like reliability.

So any way to gather people to discuss the mobile linux user experience and to come up with standards to reduce these issues would help, or even to help list all the different problems so that they can just be enumerated and acknowledged and worked on would help.

Another way that would help is to have a mobile linux security group or conference to discuss things like standards for making mobile linux more secure from brute-force attacks if stolen or seized after being unlocked.

At this point, ICE is just a group of people who harass Latinos based on racist criteria. It doesn't even have to do with immigration.

As a white person, I think of the German people who did nothing when Jewish people were gradually stripped of rights, before the eventual death camps, and I'm not actually sure of what to do. I also am not really convinced that there are no Latinos being sent to death camps right now. If there were, would I know somehow?

My political views are somewhat moderate. I just don't like racism.

Is there anything I can do that will have any meaningful impact on protecting Latinos from this racism? I do not consider protests to be meaningful and I am not asking for any suggestions that are illegal, especially since the government probably trolls these posts. I feel like I'm being a bad person by doing nothing.