In a few years: "These unkempt forests are a real eyesore, what if we sell the land to private entities"

Bo'o o wo'a

Stop deluding yourself what you're doing is decent, it's a malicious attempt to discredit artists original work. Asking someone to join your little crusade is a slap in their face, no matter how politely you ask.

She's not fond of boats or planes, I'll need to convince her going on a rocket/spaceship for the good of humanity!

Edit: As an avid Futurama fan I only now got the reference, for shame me and well played

GWR registered one at 63 leafs! Absolutely insane. Here's the picture on GWR

I've had to give away so many plants because of this

Emulators are legal

With the caveat that an emulator cannot copy any copyrighted code to use in the emulation. They try to add as much proprietary code and encryption that it's nearly impossible to emulate without breaking the law.

It's scummy, but people have and will continue to find ways around it. But even the smallest of copyright infringements will result in Nintendo's wrath.

Oh there are people who are very passionate about using Windows, in corporations almost exclusively. Had conversation with a system architect recently that made me go over every single reason why Windows isn't my first choice and got more and more frustrated because if given the choice, I would always pick OpenStack over Azure.

What Windows has are dwindling enthusiast numbers.

RCE means exactly this, the ability to run any code on a remote device (the one running notepad).

It's a parsing issue. I've encountered the same writing an MD parser for a website, not as trivial to solve as it seems. For a multi billion dollar company this is hilariously stupid. Why do I get the feeling someone vibecoded this entire implementation.

Yeah I hate Rowlings antics as much as the next lemming, but I'll never understand why posts like these have no references. I don't even take them seriously, the burden of proof is on the poster, not the reader.

Every claim should come with a direct link or reference.

I was with you until: "[...] but it can also be heard by the examiner (eg, by placing a stethoscope over the patient's external auditory canal)." and now I'm even more confused

This take could swing from normal all the way to unhinged depending on the number and size the spiders