Fuck Harry Potter. All my homies love Little Witch Academia, The Owl House and Ikenfell.
Crucially, the invitation to JKR's play came in 2018, when Epstein was already in jail. You have to be a special kind of dumb to still invite him to a public event at that point. Compared to that, Bill Clinton's contacts in 2002-2003 have pretty decent plausible deniability - it's at least possible that he didn't know that Epstein was a pedo rapist + pedo pimp, since that was before any accusations against him became public.
Clinton knew. He had briefs from US intelligence, even after out of office, a practice the current president stopped as I understand, The best news service in the world.
Would they have reported on alleged rapes, would they even have been informed of Epstein's human trafficking activities in 2002? Maybe's that's why he allegedly broke off contact in 2003. Don't know either way, but there's definitely more "maybe"s here than for inviting him in 2018.
I listened to the Lolita podcast and it's a great one hosted by someone who was a fan of the work and it made an impact on her.
It seems so many interpret the story of Lolita to be a tragic love story like Kubrick and it seems Rowling. It seems as though the more sensible interpretation would be a story about abuse and power where you're made to empathize with the unreliable narrator, Humbert. I always get an ick when I hear people say it's a love story.
where you're made to empathize with the unreliable narrator, Humbert.
And in the afterword Nabokov basically says that if you actually empathize with Humbert you're an idiot 😆
Media literacy is not particularly high as of late
Sadly not a new phenomena. Does seem to be getting worse though.....
I hate to be that person, is there a source for each bit of info? This is def something I’d like to come back to in future references.
I looked at a couple, short on time today.
Personally inviting Ep to the show is refuted by her, and several news reports say it's a fake. But in the Ep papers, there is correspondence of her team and his team working out tickets for someone. An invite did happen to someone on his team. I suspect the invite was a wide dump to the aristocrats and someone did take those tickets.
For aid in the legal expenses of white supremacists, she donated to a lot of filthy causes. No question. This happened. But the wording insinuates more than the blind payments.
Best I can tell, the things are true or kind of true, but didn't go down exactly the way they're worded here. No question, she is awful, keeps ties to awful people, and funds awful causes, but the wording here is chosen carefully to enrage the readers and create engagement.
The simple truth behind all of this was and is awful, but it's become boring. You can only write journalistic things about her dumpster fire so many times, so they're trying to come up with new angles to keep it interesting. I'm not sure that I disagree with it, honestly. Even if it's a little underhanded, keeping her in the awful spotlight is probalby worth it.
Yeah I hate Rowlings antics as much as the next lemming, but I'll never understand why posts like these have no references. I don't even take them seriously, the burden of proof is on the poster, not the reader.
Every claim should come with a direct link or reference.
I was too young and innocent to understand the evils of this world when I fell in love with the books. They were my escape in otherwise a shit childhood. I hate the author, but I cannot hate the stories that made my childhood better.
You're allowed to look back fondly while being aware of the problems. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Life is full of nuance.
Separate the art from the artist
If you can separate the artist's power and wealth from the art, this works, typically when they've been dead for a while. Otherwise you're just feeding them. Rowling herself has used the money to actively fight trans people's rights in court and used her influence to give her actions public backing.
That's not what I would call it. I think people say that to justify continuing to consume the art, which thereby supports the artist. I think support and consumption should be stopped entirely.
I know many don't agree but i even think we shouldn't pirate the art. Consuming it perpetuates relevancy, even if not giving support financially.
Similarly, I enjoyed the movies even though the books weren’t my personal style. A whole lot of people were a part of that who don’t share any of her views or knew the type of person she was at the time.
I mean I loved Orson Scott Card's book Ender's Game and the get turned out to be a right-wing loon. It doesn't change how I feel about the book.
JK Rowling's bookshelf

Is this all true? Jesus Christ, this Epstein corruption spread everywhere.
And just like with the Panama Papers, I'm afraid at some point we'll all collectively forget about it and no billionaire will be eaten.
until further notice assume every billionaire is implicated
There’s a lot to be against here, but to me, that last one is especially bad
196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.