TOTALLY NORMAL.
WE'VE ALL HAD HOLIDAYS LIKE THAT.
TOTALLY REGULAR URGE TO KEEP THE PENISES OF ROADKILL FOR CLOSER STUDY LATER.
TOTALLY NORMAL.
WE'VE ALL HAD HOLIDAYS LIKE THAT.
TOTALLY REGULAR URGE TO KEEP THE PENISES OF ROADKILL FOR CLOSER STUDY LATER.
I'm not sure I should google that.
GBE: Monster Hard Snake
I don't think you read behind my graphic detail spoiler, or you just claimed the equivalent of kissing you without your consent was just as bad as raping you, because they key point is consent. Incorrect. It is you who have missed the point. Kissing people without consent is not in any sense ok, but also trying to make out that my great aunt is a rapist because I never wanted the kisses trivialises rape and is not ok.
Username checks out.
Thank you for the suggestion, but I'm sure that my wife and two daughters would be surprised that James came inside the house after pub night, and also that any subsequent trouser truncheon touting would have extreme consequences for us all.
I wrote a longer answer which I think I was wise to delete.
Not like that. Never like that.
Well, according to the chart and your username, it's Monster Sword Pussy Sex Machine.
For my username(s): GirthyWand. Alternatively: Sex knob | Giant hammer.
Amusingly, my wife's maiden name was Love Flute, which suits her, and now she's Love Pole. Of course I'm not going to tell her either of these names.
No, I don't think so. Not me and my friends. And not where we drink.
I mean, I have no direct experimental evidence for that assertion because I don't think I've ever discussed circumcision in a bar, but I'm really very confident that none of my drinking pals are ever going to whip out their todger at the pub. And I'm not going to either. Nope.
I get where you're coming from, and I absolutely don't want to minimise anyone's pain, but circumcision is not really equivalent to FGM in terms of consequences.
graphic detail
Often FGM includes removal of the clitoris and some of the vulva, leaving girls with a tiny aperture sealed with scar tissue requiring new fully torn flesh to achieve penetration, and girls and women who have been mutilated in this way are usually unable to feel any pleasure during sex, only pain. FGM much more like having the whole glans chopped off and half of the two sides of the wound sewn together than it is like male circumcision.
Feel very free to firmly oppose circumcision, but please don't suggest that FGM is the same. It really really really isn't. It's very very different in what's removed, very very different in how much ongoing pain it causes, very very different in the effect on sensation, and it's not equivalent.
It's like suggesting that it's not fair that people treat cars running into people so much seriously than bikes running into people, except everyone, whether they ride a bicycle or a car, can see how incorrect that is, whereas a vast number of prior have no idea how brutal FGM is, which is how you end up with people claiming circumcision is just as bad. I mean, don't get me wrong. It's bad. But it's in a whole different level and world of consequences for the girl than for the boy.
Turns out deporting a bunch of people with a different shade of skin or a different accent didn't make everyone left behind richer.
All the money still goes to the multinational corporations who don't pay their taxes, the CEOs who are shielded from taxes, the shareholders who pay less taxes and the private equity investors who borrow big to buy companies then somehow magically transfer that debt to the company, and who also get a big tax discount compared to those of us who earn our money.
Turns out it was never the immigrants making Americans poor in the first place. Who knew?!
Oh yes!
You won the internet today.
Fantastic post.
My surname is not really "again".