charonn0

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That is not a distinction actually made by section 3. Oath breakers are disqualified, not rebels per se.

There are probably good arguments why qualification for a federal office isn’t properly decided by a state judge or official.

State elections officials already do that for things like age, residency requirements, etc. It's part of federalism that the state governments administer federal elections.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Sure. But she's already got that, hasn't she?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Chakotay once used the TPD as an excuse to not answer a question from Janeway.

And she just accepted it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The video appears to just be clips from the movie without commentary.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

“This is an unacceptable violation of the constitution,” said Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, a Washington Democrat and the chair of the Progressive Caucus. “Article 1 requires that military action be authorized by Congress.”

I wish she had a point here, but Congress hasn't actually done that since 1941.

Also, you are in Congress. If anybody can DO something about this, it's YOU. Complaining doesn't count.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Federalize the National Guard, use them to arrest state troopers who refuse their lawful orders to disperse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No. And that's quite my point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

all citizens are legally entitled to the same rights

It's worth pointing out that, in general and throughout history, citizenship is something that separates the privileged from the unprivileged. The in-group from the outsider. The masters and the slaves.

Touting the rights of citizens, therefore, does not necessarily rebut the parent comment's criticism.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

to test whether cash payments can protect children from the toxic stress of poverty

The answer is yes. Obviously.

I keep seeing these pilot programs and small experiments in UBI, and they all prove that people prosper and thrive more when they have more money. Nobody is surprised. Was that ever even in question?

I want to see UBI experiments, plans, etc. that tackle large-scale implementation. We've proven "BI"; that was never the hard part. We need to focus on the "U".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Assistant prosecutor Lewis Guarnieri argued to have the case move forward, which was agreed to by Warren Municipal Court Judge Terry Ivanchak.

Name and shame these monsters.

view more: ‹ prev next ›