There are two hard problems in computer programming:

1. Cache invalidation
2. Naming things
3. Off-by-one errors

Correction: 35 million people, not 35 thousand

I don't even watch Fox News and I'm tired of it.

Grognak and the Ruby Ruins, one of the Pip-Boy games you can collect in Fallout 4. Surprisingly well made and engaging.

People who hate AI can discriminate against those who celebrate it, and people who hate Apple can discriminate against their customers. That seems fair to me. Does it to you?

I see zero problem with this, at least from a moral or ethical point of view, and except perhaps describing it as "hate". This is another choice of words that seems to draw a parallel to racism and other forms of bigotry.

The issue I'm pointing to isn't that you're misusing the words technically, but that you seem to be using them to draw a parallel to unfair discrimination and prejudice, such as in racism.

The strict definition of a word can vary from its connotation in context, and a well-communicated idea accounts for both. If it was never your intention to draw a parallel to racism or other forms of bigotry then your opinion as presented is less "unpopular" and more "badly communicated".

There's nothing immoral about judging someone by their choices, though. Whether it's the clothes they wear or the tools they use. In fact, I would argue that their personal choices are the most morally defensible basis from which to form an opinion about someone.

I'm not saying the user isn't making a moral judgement, I'm saying the OP is implying a moral parallel to racism and bigotry that simply doesn't exist here.

My critique of your position is that you are intentionally using these words to imply immorality where there is none, not that you are using the words incorrectly.

In other words, I believe you're trying to say that boycotting or calling out AI use is immoral in the same way that racism is immoral. If that's not what you are trying to say, then I would suggest using different words.

Using words like "prejudice" and "discriminate" implies a moral dimension that I don't think applies here. There's nothing inherently immoral about disapproving of AI use or not wanting to unwittingly consume AI-generated content.

Kiazi's children, their faces wet.

I think you're really asking who is to blame. And I'm not so sure that's the same question, or even a useful question.