Californian. No.

It wouldn't solve any problems that can't be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven't had to worry about before. It'd be a net loss for everyone involved.

You're hardly the first person to think they can kill their way to Utopia. It has never worked.

The 14th amendment doesn't require impeachment or criminal conviction, though. It's a completely different disqualification provision from impeachment.

For example, members of Congress cannot be impeached, but they can be disqualified under the 14th amendment. It makes no sense to roll impeachment and the 14th amendment into the same category of disqualification.

The only thing Congress can do is remove Trump's disqualification under the 14th amendment. They can't decide whether he's disqualified in the first place.

Too soon!

Cybersecurity != Safety Critical

I'm sympathetic to the NYT, even if it's not reproducing their IP verbatim.

AI companies need to acknowledge that their LLMs would be worthless without training data and compensate/credit the sources appropriately.

I'm not interesting enough to worry about people being unduly interested in me.

The implication is that only people on Putin's payroll wouldn't see it as treason.

Pick out your least favorite song by your most favorite artist. You'll find a new appreciation.

Isn't this basically the same as arguing that men don't deserve or need help?

You're implying that the OP contains errors or mistakes. Could you explain what you're referring to?