top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 155 points 1 year ago (36 children)

Eh, it's more about the enthusiasm than the qualifications. Plus, while Bill Nye is no angel, at least he's not a Putin supporter.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 136 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Bill Nye is an entertainer / educator. I've met plenty of people with PHDs and masters who couldn't present a basic concept because they're too caught up in technicalities and not understanding what it's like to teach and get people interested in something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 year ago (23 children)

    Is there some controversy around Bill Nye that I haven't heard?

    He has been a leading science communicator covering hundreds of topics for many decades, and is only human, of course there are going to be shortcomings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    He has a reputation of just being an unpleasant dick and difficult to work with. Nothing super problematic to my knowledge, just a bad personality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 121 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Nye is more of if an educator than scientist. A lot like your average science teacher in high school.

    Dolph is usually posted in this manner to put down Nye's support for climate research, anti creationism, and other 'political' stands.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 103 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    He's a science guy, not a scientist.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • load more comments (21 replies)
    [–] 90 points 1 year ago (26 children)

    bill nye is not a scientist, and he never claimed to be one. He is a science communicator, a role he has done well for some time.

    Same with Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Not the same with Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

    I'm not his biggest fan, but I fully respect his scientific credentials. He has a PhD from Columbia. He published at least a dozen papers. There's no question that he's a scientist, a manager of scientists, as well as a science communicator.

    The problem is that his success seems to have destroyed his humility. It's not that he brags about being so incredibly smart. It's more that he doesn't ever seem to sit back and say "hey, maybe this isn't something where my contributions won't be appreciated". I think his science communication is doing more good than harm. I think he's a great role model for little black boys who think all scientists are white, or that they're all stuffy nerds with no personality. But, I think he's at his best when he's in a show where there's a script and an editor. On social media and on free-form podcasts, he comes off as a know-it-all ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 89 points 1 year ago* (15 children)

    And he is a Trump and Putin supporter. Fuck him.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] 90 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 66 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    to be fair bill nye is using his degree and teaching rather than someone that just ditched his degree after he got it. in a job setting they will take bill nye over someone that hasnt used his degree in a while. some people. one is passionate about the stems while the other ones wasnt, some people get higher degrees just because of pressure in thier social circles and then end up hating it and leaving, there were alot of those people in college.

    they are seeing someone as having more prestige and degree means they are more qualfied than someone that has more experience in the field.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago

    Bill is just a science guy after all. Not a science lord.

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    ...Does Bill Nye need more qualifications to be an effective science educator?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    He does not. This post is gatekeeping bullshit. The only thing that matters is knowledge of a subject. This shit reminds me of the worthless dumbfucks who immediately start asking for credentials when I tell them that their understanding of AI is nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 year ago
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (19 children)

    What do you guys think is so special about a scientist.

    They measure things and record data really well. They apply scientific principles and such.

    They use lab equipment and usually have a very narrow scope on the things they are working on.

    Do you think every scientist gets a nobel or something?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (19 replies)
    [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    It's tragic that he never got to play a scientist who could smell crime.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    More educated, you mean? Cuz to my knowledge only one of them works in science

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    He quit the Fulbright thing after two weeks though.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Exponential in which variable?

  • source
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "Bill nye the science guy"

    Fair enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Carl Sagan, Neil Tyson, Dora the Explorer. All very important. Be interested in things.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    What about a masters in engineering and a bachelor's in chemistry makes him even double more qualified? Yeah, maybe if he had a doctorate you could make that argument, but you could easily learn and do as much science work in 6 years outside of a university than you would in a BS and MS program at a university.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Dolph, Dolph, Dolph!

    Dolph Lundgren the science front man.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Its not the size of your knowledge. Its what you do with it that counts.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›