To be fair, it was supposed to be wild takes. An actually realistic version of 269-269 looks like this:

The transness be with you

I don't even have the words for this. I doubt this will even be covered in US media though, can't let people in start to have even an ounce of sympathy

This is transphobia, swallowing my head

down with cis

I feel like only 1 (not faithless) electoral vote is almost more cruel

Someone should make this and discreetly replace it with the other copy and see how long it takes for anyone to notice

Just in case anyone is curious what would happen IRL in this scenario, the state delegations of the newly elected House would decide the President on January 6.

Source: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R40504.pdf

The one district in Nebraska being the only place voting for Dems is funny

I am fine if people consider me a freak now, but I hope in the future, people will see me for who I truly am.

We see you

I hope you can find people in real life who can see you too

is definitely the more accelerationist option at least according to liberal theory which suggests that states in relative decline should turn inward, which explains the rise of Trump isolationism. Consequently, her administration would only serve to continue sharpening contradictions at best, and doing Trump policies at worst.

Maybe isn't actually such a bad idea after all...

What is "weird," anyway? That word has different connotations, honestly.

This. For me, all of this is perfectly normal and relatable. I'll disclose that I do have autism (under the former diagnosis of "Asperger's Syndrome") and a still somewhat uncertain relationship with gender too as a result.

Why should "neurobland" (term I'm coining here based on "neurospicy" for neurodivergents) people get the monopoly on what's considered "normal"? We'd call that bigotry if it was any other mainstream group doing that to a marginalized group.