Eh, more likely governor of Greenland maybe.
At the very least, I think this could further radicalise a significant amount of people, and wasn’t there this gentleman who mentioned how quantitative changes accumulate into qualitative change?
Eventually, I do think we should start moving away from GDP as a primary metric of a country’s performance. Things like life expectancy, access to transportation, fewer working hours, gender equality, etc. matter a lot more to people living there once GDP per capita reaches a certain point. But Japan isn’t really trying to do those either.
Meanwhile the Centrist: Wow, both of you are equally awful!
The difficult solution is to become more competitive and find new sources of value, as the US does with its technology industry. That means more reform, less welfare and less regulation: not because welfare and regulation are bad per se, but because they are unaffordable given the competition.
It is now increasingly hard to see how Europe, in particular, can avoid large-scale protection if it is to retain any industry at all.
So the plan is to wreck your welfare policies with neoliberal-style austerity... then also violate neoliberal principles through protectionism? This isn't just following a bad plan, this is following no plan. Also, I really don't see how deliberately making your workforce poorer and less educated will somehow produce 'new sources of value'.
If the dispute drags on, a drop in Chinese visitors, such as the fall of roughly 25% seen during an island dispute in 2012, could deliver a significant economic hit for Japan, said Takahide Kiuchi, executive economist at Nomura Research Institute.
Worries about such a hit caused a dip in tourism-sensitive shares in Tokyo, with department store operator Isetan Mitsukoshi falling 11.3%, while Japan Airlines gave up 3.7%.
Yeah, the Japanese corpos probably got annoyed and yanked her leash a bit. Bourgeois dictatorship remains a bourgeois dictatorship.
The Solar + Battery combo is so, so valuable to many people with unreliable and/or expensive power. It really is the first time that households and small communities can have control over their own energy, when people can just stand up and do something about their power needs. The bottom-up solar boom in Pakistan is a prime example of this, and at least in this area I'm really hopeful.
Ugh, hopefully this is just the flailing of a dying empire rather than anything more systemic. The US knows that as its grip on the global economy weakens, so does the efficacy of its embargo.

What I really appreciate with China's AI approach is their focus on open source models and frameworks, and their emphasis on practical AI applications. That's why almost all of the top open source models (Deepseek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi), are all from China, which means anyone with enough hardware can run it on their own devices.
This chart really shows the stark difference between the two countries, which is to be expected, as neoclassical economics treats energy as an intermediate good, rather than as the foundation of basically every economic sector today.
Everything needs energy, and you can't just substitute it with something else. China recognizes this, and is expanding renewable energy production faster than the rest of the world combined. I suspect this blind spot will haunt the US for decades to come as their industries become increasingly noncompetitive due to high energy prices.
How liberal electoral systems convinced everyone that they are democratic, despite consistently failing to achieve majority approval or support, is probably one of the greatest propaganda success stories in modern history.
SouffleHuman
0 post score0 comment score
Honestly, sounds like a cool name for a fully unified global communist nation. No need to put 'of X', just call it The People's Republic.