[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 28 points 4 days ago

It’s a stunning visual, but it doesn’t even begin to capture the staggering amount of solar power being produced by the People’s Republic.

The People’s Republic

Honestly, sounds like a cool name for a fully unified global communist nation. No need to put 'of X', just call it The People's Republic.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 weeks ago

Eh, more likely governor of Greenland maybe.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

At the very least, I think this could further radicalise a significant amount of people, and wasn’t there this gentleman who mentioned how quantitative changes accumulate into qualitative change?

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 month ago

Eventually, I do think we should start moving away from GDP as a primary metric of a country’s performance. Things like life expectancy, access to transportation, fewer working hours, gender equality, etc. matter a lot more to people living there once GDP per capita reaches a certain point. But Japan isn’t really trying to do those either.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile the Centrist: Wow, both of you are equally awful!

13
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml to c/news@hexbear.net

https://archive.ph/1hnqw

European manufacturers are increasing their investment in Chinese factories, despite growing anxiety among the continent’s political leaders about industrial dependence on the world’s exporting superpower.

A survey [...] found that about one-quarter were moving more production into the country — twice as many as were diversifying to other countries. The numbers included 80 per cent of respondents in the pharmaceuticals sector, 46 per cent in machinery and 40 per cent in medical devices.

4
submitted 2 months ago by SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml to c/us_news@lemmygrad.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/39904354

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf

Lots of interesting things here, but here are a few key points:

  • They are explicit about reviving the Monroe doctrine, specifically saying they need to readjust their military specifically to "address urgent threats" in the Americas
  • A push to make their ~~vassals~~ allies build up their own military, saying "The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over" (kinda self aggrandizing but okay)
  • There's a lot focusing on countering China, but around 80% is talking about economic and industrial stuff, there's surprisingly little about military, mostly saying that they need Japan and the ROK to step up, and also that they "[do] not support any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait." (which implies they wouldn't want Taiwan to declare independence either)
  • Saying that Europe's undergoing "civilizational erasure", talks about immigration and free speech, and aiming towards "Cultivating resistance to Europe’s current trajectory within European nations" (sounds kind of like regime change?), and "Ending the perception, and preventing the reality, of NATO as a perpetually expanding alliance"
  • The Middle East section is basically glazing Trump's peacemaking skills, declaring that the US can step away because the region is stable now (not sure what to say about that)
  • They want to pursue more trade and investment with Africa, also something about countering "Islamic terrorist activity"
14
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml to c/news@hexbear.net

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf

Lots of interesting things here, but here are a few key points:

  • They are explicit about reviving the Monroe doctrine, specifically saying they need to readjust their military specifically to "address urgent threats" in the Americas
  • A push to make their ~~vassals~~ allies build up their own military, saying "The days of the United States propping up the entire world order like Atlas are over" (kinda self aggrandizing but okay)
  • There's a lot focusing on countering China, but around 80% is talking about economic and industrial stuff, there's surprisingly little about military, mostly saying that they need Japan and the ROK to step up, and also that they "[do] not support any unilateral change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait." (which implies they wouldn't want Taiwan to declare independence either)
  • Saying that Europe's undergoing "civilizational erasure", talks about immigration and free speech, and aiming towards "Cultivating resistance to Europe’s current trajectory within European nations" (sounds kind of like regime change?), and "Ending the perception, and preventing the reality, of NATO as a perpetually expanding alliance"
  • The Middle East section is basically glazing Trump's peacemaking skills, declaring that the US can step away because the region is stable now (not sure what to say about that)
  • They want to pursue more trade and investment with Africa, also something about countering "Islamic terrorist activity"
[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

https://archive.is/Bqlf0

The difficult solution is to become more competitive and find new sources of value, as the US does with its technology industry. That means more reform, less welfare and less regulation: not because welfare and regulation are bad per se, but because they are unaffordable given the competition.

It is now increasingly hard to see how Europe, in particular, can avoid large-scale protection if it is to retain any industry at all.

So the plan is to wreck your welfare policies with neoliberal-style austerity... then also violate neoliberal principles through protectionism? This isn't just following a bad plan, this is following no plan. Also, I really don't see how deliberately making your workforce poorer and less educated will somehow produce 'new sources of value'.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If the dispute drags on, a drop in Chinese visitors, such as the fall of roughly 25% seen during an island dispute in 2012, could deliver a significant economic hit for Japan, said Takahide Kiuchi, executive economist at Nomura Research Institute.

Worries about such a hit caused a dip in tourism-sensitive shares in Tokyo, with department store operator Isetan Mitsukoshi falling 11.3%, while Japan Airlines gave up 3.7%.

Yeah, the Japanese corpos probably got annoyed and yanked her leash a bit. Bourgeois dictatorship remains a bourgeois dictatorship.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The Solar + Battery combo is so, so valuable to many people with unreliable and/or expensive power. It really is the first time that households and small communities can have control over their own energy, when people can just stand up and do something about their power needs. The bottom-up solar boom in Pakistan is a prime example of this, and at least in this area I'm really hopeful.

41
submitted 3 months ago by SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml to c/us_news@lemmygrad.ml

Archived Link: https://archive.ph/eoMS1

So Venezuela, Nigeria, and now Mexico... If this isn't the textbook definition of overextension, I don't know what is.

The Trump administration has started planning for on-the-ground military and intelligence operations on Mexican soil to pursue drug cartels as part of what President Donald Trump has described as an “armed conflict” with narcotics trafficking organizations.

“I don’t think we're going to necessarily ask for a declaration of war. I think we’re just going to kill people that are bringing drugs into our country, OK? We’re going to kill them,” Trump said during a White House roundtable with administration officials.

In August, Sheinbaum told reporters at a press conference that her government would not permit American military personnel to unilaterally take action on Mexican soil.

“The United States is not going to come to Mexico with their military — we cooperate, we collaborate, but there will be no invasion. It’s off the table, absolutely off the table,” she said.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago

Ugh, hopefully this is just the flailing of a dying empire rather than anything more systemic. The US knows that as its grip on the global economy weakens, so does the efficacy of its embargo.

43
submitted 3 months ago by SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml to c/china@lemmygrad.ml

China aims to raise average life expectancy to around 80 years in 5 years

China has already reached a life expectancy of 79 years, surpassing that of the US (78.4). The government aims to reach 80 years in the upcoming 5 year plan.

BEIJING, Oct. 24 -- China aims to increase the average life expectancy of its people to around 80 years through efforts planned for a five-year period from 2026 to 2030, announced the country's top health official on Friday.

By the end of 2024, the average life expectancy of the Chinese people had reached 79 years -- an extraordinary achievement among developing countries, said Lei Haichao, head of the National Health Commission.

According to Lei, China has established the world's largest health service system, disease prevention and control system, and medical insurance system over the past five years, marking remarkable progress in the country's healthcare and population development.

China has also weathered a once-in-a-century pandemic and continuously improved its people's average life expectancy during the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-2025), the official said.

"Based on the international development trend, the comprehensive national strength and work foundation of China, we hope to raise the average life expectancy of the Chinese population by one year in five years," the official added.

By the end of 2024, the number of elderly people aged 60 and above in China had reached 310.31 million, accounting for 22 percent of the country's total population.

On Thursday, the 20th Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee concluded its fourth plenary session, where participants deliberated and adopted the Recommendations of the CPC Central Committee for Formulating the 15th Five-Year Plan for Economic and Social Development.

The document requires enhancing both life expectancy and the overall health of the people.

Introducing work plans for the next five years, Lei vowed to improve elderly care by optimizing basic elderly care services, advancing long-term care insurance, upgrading support for elderly people with disabilities or dementia, and expanding rehabilitation and palliative care services.

According to statistics released by the Ministry of Civil Affairs this October, by the end of last year, the country also had 406,000 elderly care institutions and facilities with nearly 8 million beds, while various financial subsidies had benefited 49.45 million seniors.

In order to help Chinese people live healthier, higher-quality lives with longer life expectancy, Lei noted that disease prevention will be a key focus of China's health sector.

"Efforts will be made to advance family doctor services, to boost health knowledge promotion, and to effectively control weight, blood pressure, blood lipids and blood glucose, so that every individual can be master of their own health," Lei said.

He added that medical institutions will explore effective ways to treat chronic diseases such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes.

"Additionally, we will strengthen primary healthcare systems and promote mobile health services and telemedicine to ensure people have access to convenient, efficient, and relatively high-quality medical care close to home," Lei said.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 months ago

What I really appreciate with China's AI approach is their focus on open source models and frameworks, and their emphasis on practical AI applications. That's why almost all of the top open source models (Deepseek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi), are all from China, which means anyone with enough hardware can run it on their own devices.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This chart really shows the stark difference between the two countries, which is to be expected, as neoclassical economics treats energy as an intermediate good, rather than as the foundation of basically every economic sector today.

Everything needs energy, and you can't just substitute it with something else. China recognizes this, and is expanding renewable energy production faster than the rest of the world combined. I suspect this blind spot will haunt the US for decades to come as their industries become increasingly noncompetitive due to high energy prices.

[-] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 months ago

How liberal electoral systems convinced everyone that they are democratic, despite consistently failing to achieve majority approval or support, is probably one of the greatest propaganda success stories in modern history.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

SouffleHuman

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 months ago