[–] 3 points 3 days ago (1 child)

We have enough minable nuclear fuel to sustain our current power needs for a couple billion years. And with enough technological gains, we can extend that to well past the time that the sun has died. Hence, it is safe to consider it renewable.

Doesn't invalidate your point, but I just wanted to point this nugget of info out.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago

    Not true. The prices are higher because less fuel is available. You can't burn what ain't there.

    Plus, the increased fuel prices mean alternatives become more attractive. This stimulates investments into these alternatives. Hence the price increase speeds up the transition to better technologies. This is why an emmision tax could work.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    For the laymen: update operating systems, browsers, and apps. And avoid doing sensitive stuff over Wifi networks other than your own (or from people or organisations that you fully trust, and the network must be password protected). Once this mess is cleaned up, the latter will be safe again. All you need to do for the cleanup is updating everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Neither does the use of an LLM mean you do not understand thoroughly what you submit. He doesn't give a crap how the code was created, as long as you, the human (I hope), understand what you are submitting and can take accountability for it. You are still responsible for whatever crap comes out of an LLM, the same way that you are responsible for what comes out of the compiler. Doesn't mean you shouldn't use compilers or LLMs.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    You see a tiny clip that matches your world view: police are bad. And instantly you no longer care about context. This is exactly how MAGA processes information.

    Always demand the full picture. Never listen to only one side. And stay cricital of all evidence shown. That is hard, but at least stop downvoting and telling off people that point this out.

    And I repeat: this still looks bad. Very much worth investigating what happened. Most likely this cop went out of line. But let's not play judge based on a couple of seconds of contextless video.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    In Dutch, the word "kanker" can be used as verb, noun or adjective. Example: Die kanker hoer kan opkankeren met die kanker van haar. Which best translates to something like: That fucking whore can fuck off with that shit of hers. Except that the Dutch version is wayyyyy more rude and inappropriate.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It at the very least got popular in the Netherlands. This was due to a youtube upload from 2008 of a Dutch student who was proud to be the first person to swaffel the Taj Mahal. This resulted in more people swinging their dicks against various monuments.

    So if you see a popular monument, remember that it is likely a Dutch person filmed themselves while wacking their dick against it and put it on youtube somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Just put cheap beans in the packaging of the expensive ones. Same shock value for them, less guilt for you. And remember, the performance is everything here; you have to sell it for maximum emotional damage.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›