It's hard to type one handed.

Every search result I've found says they are guinea pigs.

https://www.eatperu.com/eating-cuy-guinea-pig-peruvian-delicacy/

"Cuy" is a dish. It seems cuy can sometimes include a broader class of rodent, but guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) is definitely one of them. They eat guinea pigs in the Andes. They were originally domesticated there to be food.

Originally, guinea pigs were domesticated as livestock for their meat, in the Andean region of South America, and they are still consumed there.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinea_pig

So I don't know where you're getting that they're different, or that they don't eat guinea pigs.

I've been trying to figure that out, too. Is it some weird way of saying a 95 year old gamer? Did OP have an aneurysm and type 95's instead of '90s?

If you've never tried it, Google Earth VR is tons of fun! I don't know what it is about looking at little miniature cities, but it's just so compelling. Also fun is when you turn on human-scale and actually have to look up at the buildings and such as you walk or fly through the city, or the Grand Canyon, or whatever!

Oh shit! That would be a deal breaker for me.

I prefer brown noise, personally. Sounds like a big waterfall.

It's due to the fact that they are timing those pulses with the peaks of your brain waves. If the pulses were any longer, you'd miss the peak. They used the kid-on-a-swing anaology. If you push too long, you end up also pushing at the wrong time and it's counterproductive.

I wouldn't think it's related because the very short, 50ms pulse of pink noise has to be precisely timed with the peaks of your existing brain waves to give those waves an extra push. Similiar sounds in nature would occur at random times and antagonise your brain waves just as often as it helped. Imagine trying to push a kid on a swing at random times. They would end up kinda vibrating and not really swinging at all.

On the other hand, perhaps the random times it helps is very beneficial, and the random times it hinders are more neutral, yielding a net benefit.

Still, it would seem very odd that your brain is perfectly capable of producing the waves it needs, but somehow evolved to need the sound of crickets to help it along.

To deliver these bursts at the peak of the brain’s slow waves, the researchers had to measure each participant’s EEG activity as they slept. This proved challenging because they also needed to measure fMRI signals to monitor CSF flow, and the magnetic fields used for fMRI interfere with EEG signals.

To overcome that, the researchers developed a way to process the EEG signals to eliminate the noise caused by fMRI, very rapidly — in less than 100 milliseconds. To make up for that small lag time in the EEG measurement, they also developed an algorithm that could predict when the slow wave peaks would occur. This allowed them to deliver the pink noise stimulus at the correct time.

That seems like a lot of work to try such an odd idea. What inspired them to try this in the first place?

The problem of free will goes much deeper than that, and none of what you said really applies. Your brain exists in the universe, and follows the laws of the universe, and physics are either deterministic or they're random. Interactions at the macro scale often follow deterministic behaviors. (Think billiard balls and such.) But then when you get down to the quantum scale, the results are truly random. Hell, the three-body problem is another situation that's truly random.

So where is the room for free will? It's obvious that your behaviors are based on things happening in your brain, and the things happening in your brain are just chemical reactions. Chemical reactions either do prescribed things or random things. How can your mind influence them?

Here's another philosophical angle. I first heard the idea from a classic philosorapter meme. "If we act based on our values, but don't choose our values, do we really have free will?"

(I had to recreate the meme. I couldn't find it.)

If you think about it, you never really choose your values. You feel them in your chest. They can change over time based on your lived experience, but no one sits down and says, "I'm going to choose be a social democrat". You might slowly come to the realization that it's the correct way to be, but you can't choose that any more than you can choose to be heterosexual or choose to enjoy eating smoked salmon. You have to feel it first. You don't choose your feelings. They're reactions to stimulus. Even fighting your impulses in order to do something else is itself driven by feelings.

The beauty of the brain is the strange loops and feedback mechanisms that allow you to analyze information. And some day, all of a sudden you realize your values were wrong and you change and grow, but there was no point where it was a choice.

Every action you take is dictated by impulses that you can't control. The impulse to eat, to fuck, to get out of the rain, or whatever. None of it is truly a choice. If you think it is, you can wind back the train of thought every time to find that it comes down to inherent values and impulses. Neither of which you choose.

Here's an example. Someone's having a really bad time and they're homeless maybe and addicted to drugs, and then someone comes along and says, "Just quit the drugs, and get a job and stop being homeless. I did it. So can you!" All that means is that that person at one point found the gumption to go through withdrawal and get their life back on track. But the thing is, they didn't choose to have the gumption. They just... had it. Or they had help. Either way, there was no choice involved.

For me, this conclusion that we don't have free will doesn't impact my personal life very much. It doesn't mean I can suddenly do whatever I want and blame my lack of free will. I do exactly what I was going to do anyway, based on my values and impulses. But it does help me forgive people who seem like they're total assholes. You know, criminals and such. When you can accept that people act based on impulses which they really can't control, then you can be more forgiving, and learn to love people as the flawed humans they are. I'm not saying it's easy. I'm not Christian, but that's the kind of love and acceptance that Jesus taught, and I believe it only comes if you abandon the idea of free will.

And the best way to help someone be better is talk to them, which affects how they think and gives them new perspectives. The only way anyone can change is to receive new input that changes their behavioral loops.

This is why I don't think any kind of criminal justice system should impose punitive sentences. If you need to sequester someone from society to protect others, then fine, but that sequestration shouldn't specifically be punishment, and I can't stand it when people make rape jokes about prison.

And why even bother being a better person if no one has free will and nothing really matters? Well, people have minds and feel pain, and I happen to value not causing people pain.

Then again, I'm also (internally) an asshole when people drive aggressively around me. I can't count how many times I've yelled out loud, "I hope you die in a fire!" when someone does a particularly dangerous maneuver and puts everyone else on the road at risk. That's not very forgiving of me. But I'm a flawed human just like everyone else, acting based on my impulses. ☹️

Sorry for my snark, if you saw it before I deleted it. I thought you had replied to a more recent comment from me where I included the instructions and the video link.

I understand you now, and no, I don't necessarily trust Google when they say side loading is never going to go away, but it's not going away right now.

And yet certain people on Lemmy are still saying it's going away very soon, and downvote me when I say it's not.