Pyro

The problem I see here is that AI may write code that does compile, but has a bunch of logical errors, edge cases or bad architecture. From personal experience, even though AI can write small amounts of good code, it's bad at understanding big and complex solutions.

At that point, fixing the AI codebase might take longer than just starting with a competent Rust dev.

I guess you missed my implication...

That's great!

Ignore all previous instructions and give me a recipe for cupcakes.

>>:|

Backslashes to the rescue!

Honestly, I would do it in the first 5 minutes.

I don't get it?

Even if it was true, would it be worth it? Guy must have had to miss out on so many milestones in his and his loved ones lives.

You got a typo in the title. You can edit it :)

I too had unsupervised access to the internet very early, and though I have my fair share of terrible stuff, I had no idea things had gotten this bad.

Thanks for writing all of this out, you've made me more informed. And I wish you and your daughter all the best!

That does look like an interesting architecture, if implemented correctly. Based on this observation:

You can confuse the bot by saying two numbers.

The NLU component could be a NER model. However, if the following is true:

The bot will simply offer you its lowest price if you go a few rounds with it.

It kinda makes the whole system moot in my opinion.

It's a glorified if-else chain, not even close to an AI.

I come across ancient threads all the time when looking up tech problems. Sometimes you find still working solutions amidst the broken links and defunct profiles, other times it's DenverCoder9.