-13
submitted 16 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Human society does the same thing.

We're ok when we talk about what we saw.

Less so when we talk about what somebody else saw.

Crazier and crazier when we talk about what somebody said about what somebody said about what somebody saw. Which is arguably the internet.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It could be inherently flawed. We look at a picture or a symbol and pretend it's real. That's insane. I mean, I know that's kinda how it works, but still. Insane.

Or maybe it's imprecise to call it a flaw. Maybe call it a trap, to be careful of. But nobody's careful. (So that's maybe an "out of control" situation)

(I know I'm not. I mean case in point. I'm watching this movie "don't look up" right now and I'm getting all teary-eyed and stuff. It's a fucking movie. An illusion of flickering images and bullshit. I know with great certainty that it's just a fantasy but I'm still having this reaction. So that's insane)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

Is it inherently bad? Out of control? Something else?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

We could order understanding by quality.

First there is perception. That's the closest. Then there is thought about that. Then there is the secondhand form of that, gotten from a friend. Then gotten from a mere associate. Then a stranger. Thirdhand and fourthhand. And so on.

Close to far. That close kind you don't even have to think or talk about it.

Perceptions like rightness, beauty, gut make a good guide. Art and invention are proof of that. Call it a good source of truth.

Not too good for building objective consensuses tho.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hypothetically, one could step away from the whole internet/media/information system. Stick with firsthand experience and the testimony of trusted friends.

To what degree would that include "science"?

What would that look like. Amish?

36
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Carpenter coder here. I like saving my code powers for my own beloved projects.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My thoughts as well.

It makes me wonder about my own fears. How many of them were put there by propaganda?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That was the original idea for alien. The aliens are actually this advanced cultured race. But they get crazy in childhood and puberty.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Society is insane. Gotta deal with that somehow.

I'm a rural carpenter. I fly under all radar.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Me to. Dr Who. I had the dumbest british accent through my teens.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago

Finish the paper, or don't, the outcome is the same. You don't have to worry about the paper anymore. Which is what really matters here.

The second way is easier.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

it's a basic prerequisite for participation in contemporary society.

A fancy way of saying "mandatory"

-43
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Plesiohedron

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 days ago