[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Oh no way. That's wild.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

As usual, leftists have championed a doomed cause

The timing of this post . . . sounds like this is her launching her anti-Zohran Mamdani campaign on behalf of her [suspected] DNC sponsors

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

I remember the first time I saw that comment and all those college words in the first paragraph made me just skip the rest.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Isn’t that now? How many replies in that thread do you think were at least composed with the assistance of AI if not outright bots? Why do so many start with the same sort of affirmation?

[-] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago

Spending every day on Twitter attacking the left and blaming it for all of our problems isn’t nothing thank you very much.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Alright all you hogs shitting on your own balls. You’ll be feasting off this thread for weeks.

(Also can somebody tell me if I removed the tracking elements of the link correctly?)

[-] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because like 95% of the churches should already lose their tax-exempt status over this and they don't enforce it anyway

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

The 74-40 tomatoes being unpeeled and unsliced in the picture is very confusing

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

There is not a really clear line between "non-Zionist" and "anti-Zionist" but, with Zionism being a political ideology and Judaism being a religion, a "non-Zionist Jew" could be used to describe a member of the Jewish religion whose Jewish identity and religious belief does not involve any Zionism while an "anti-Zionist Jew" is a Jewish person who takes an affirmative political or ideological stance against Zionism. And of course there would be significant overlap between the two.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Much more nuanced. Doesn’t hit it square on the nose by saying “she was, at base, a liberal bourgeois academic who never fully opened her eyes to it even after nearly being ground in the gears of that system” but basically hints at that. The end of that one even says that you should read her despite her, shall we say, banal liberal racism/orientalism (including, famously, against poor, Eastern European Jews). But the context helps to understand when she is making valid observations and decent (and sometimes controversial) insights and when she misses the mark because of her prejudices.

[-] [email protected] 103 points 7 months ago

And they could have just made a fucking deal a month into the war.

marx-doomer

view more: next ›

Maturin

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago