Don't you know? Click bait headlines have to say "someone"
The difference here is that I can reasonably believe the quarter second of spray being an accurate serving, but nobody has just one tictac.
It's honestly hard to say. It's very impressive what AI coding can do, especially in the past year, but all AI companies are not making a profit. They're effectively subsidized by investors. They're focused on growth. At some point they're gonna need to make a profit, they cannot continually operate at a loss and focus on growth. In fact, when Microsoft started charging properly it was such a massive deal that they called it the tokenpocalypse.
Honestly, I hate to say it, and I'm not trying to be a tech bro, but I think AI is here to say. What exactly it looks like long term, it's hard to say. I can say this though, knowing how to program will make you a better vibe coded (I feel dirty saying that seriously). So even if AI becomes the norm, you'll be better positioned if you know what you're doing.
When things turn though, it's impossible to say. It could be in the next year, could be like five years out. It could be that when you're done with your four year degree, they're still out here doing this "AI is gonna fix everything and we don't need junior devs" song and dance.
TL;DR: AI is not profitable now so will get more expensive meaning they'll have to use it less. Either way, knowing how to program without AI will make you better at programming with AI.
Always take the lump sum!
In the movie, I don't specifically remember them showing that (but might be mistaken, they certainly did loot Troy), but
Minor spoiler if you care
One witch character curses his men and turns them into pigs because she believes they would have stolen from her and had their way with her. Odysseus very specifically uses the argument that they didn't do those things to her while convincing her to change them back. So take as you will. You could interpret this as Odysseus's men not being rapists. But I don't really remember the dialogue or flashbacks super well, I might be forgetting something. All that said, even if it didn't happen on screen, I don't really think there's a specific reason to believe they didn't do it off screen based on the overall tone and theme of the movie.
(It's been a long time since I read the story, so it may have been different.)
What's more likely, that all of them were ace or that some of them were homosexual?
My mom was weirdly prudish in the '90s and early '00s, I don't really know why. Like she wouldn't let me watch Dexter's Lab because she thought it was gross or something? Idk. Weird time.
My mom told me never to click "I'm feeling lucky" because she thought it had something to do with porn because it's a phrase people would say about sex.
Evil Chinese company as opposed to an evil American one?
And yet many Chromium forks are following suit and disabling Manifest v2 support. The idea that these things "don't need support" is silly when we're talking about the Herculean effort of maintaining a browser. Yes, anyone can but when the vast majority of browsers are Chromium forks instead of individually created and maintained ones, how much effort do you think those organizations have?
It's good that browsers like Brave have an alternative means of ad blocking, and Firefox even has Brave's exact same blocker built in now, but the idea that "you can just fork and block" is missing the point.
Google has effectively won. They are the de facto controller of web standards now that the majority of browsers use Chromium. When they began dropping support for Manifest v2 in 2019 it was the same year they said ad blockers were a major threat to their revenue in their publicly filed shareholder statements. This isn't some conspiracy theory either, you can literally go look that up. They dropped v2 because ad blocking was too powerful and gutted it in v3. They know that the ecosystem of browser forks they helped create depends on their dev effort and won't keep v2.
Even if v2 and ad blocking stay around, people still need to get the fuck off of Chromium. It's ads today, but could be something else tomorrow. The problem is Google getting to easily control what like >80% of browsers see and do all because they control Chromium. Even if Google was suddenly like "you know what, we're turning v2 back on," I'd still be practically begging everyone to stay the fuck off of Chromium and get into something Firefox based. This is about so much more than just ads.
Ghostery blocks trackers then sells data about your tracking blocking habits. It was the first tracker blocker I heard of but Privacy Badger is the better one nowadays.
This will likely have some technical inaccuracies because I've never dealt with something this specific with PSUs. I have two slots for PCIe. I have a 3070 ti which has two 8 pin connectors. Each of this PSU's cords for the PCIe slots (minus that mysterious 600W one which I think is not for anything I'm doing due to the size) goes from the 12 pin on the PSU to two separate 8 pin connectors (well, 6 with the optional 2).
My gut feeling is to just plug a single cord from the PCIe slots I to the two slots on my GPU. But I'm wondering about what would happen if I plugged two cords into the PCIe slots separately and then put a single connector into the GPU from each. Would that be better/worse/the same/catastrophic?
I'm wondering if it has something to do with dividing the current among the different rails in the PSU or something? It has a little jumper to enable "overclocking" which does something like combining the rails, but I'd rather not fool with that. And it also might be totally unrelated to the other question. The jumper is, of course, just out of view of the pic, but it's also not really relevant.
Edit: I went with one and it's working fine.
Do I need to remove this excess thermal paste that squished out? Or can I leave it?
(programming.dev)
Sorry for the horrible picture. It's hard enough to see with my eyes, let alone get a pic.
My guess
The left sort of looks like the outside of the cable so I think that's ground.
