The funny thing is that this sort of happened. I don't know if it ever happened this lewdly, but I'm pretty sure folks would ship around portraits of themselves as a means of courting.
IANAH - I am not a historian
The funny thing is that this sort of happened. I don't know if it ever happened this lewdly, but I'm pretty sure folks would ship around portraits of themselves as a means of courting.
IANAH - I am not a historian
Knowledge!

I think that it's natural for people to think they admit when they're wrong, but it's also natural to not admit it. As humans we don't make decisions based on logic, we do it based on emotions. We then instead explain our decisions with logic. I think the usual way people's minds change is that they'll effectively be convinced of something but won't really admit or accept it (or even be consciously aware of it), but then the next time the topic comes up they'll have the new opinion.
Did you not read the actual change?
- You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).
I've got one sitting by my TV, haven't ever used it. I'll fiddle with it today to see how high it can measure.
I thought you webdevs were good with implied semicolons because of JavaScript lol
If you're willing to pay they probably will, but it's something that's generally very expensive, so not something they advertise. If you're serious about it, look into business offerings.
It just feels really baseless to me. Have you read their terms of service? I'm sure there are other similar things in there. Like most terms of service there are parts that say they reserve the right to remove things for reasons not specifically listed. For example, they say if something is harmful to their organization they can remove it even if something isn't listed explicitly. And that's something that pretty much all services say. So why is this specifically the thing that makes you worried?
Has Codeberg earned a reputation of deleting things without warning and not making good decisions though?
I bought one on r/MicrosoftSoftwareSwap for really cheap back in the day with Bitcoin. It stopped working because I assume they sold the same key again. They never responded to me when I asked about it and Bitcoin blew up so much in price that it probably cost as much as a real key from Microsoft afterwards.
I love Linux.
7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5).
That feels like a reasonable middle ground. Allow some things with some AI written code, but don't allow stuff that is a majority of AI code.
If you have more specific questions about Codeberg's decision, you should ask them, not me.