DADDYCHILL

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

when the us headhunts for only labor aristocracy and persecuted car salesmen you get a negative feedback loop of people who consider themselves the best and above their countrymen. i want the global south to judge these judas' for abandoning their country. obviously not all are bad but i feel like miami would be a lot emptier if there was some kind of reckoning against reactionary people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not all people who move to the us are privileged though. its just that people that move from communist countries tend to be. like mexican people specifically are sort of an underclass that are exploited for cheap labor. you can find leftist sentiment in immigrants, just not immigrants from places that have actually achieved socialism.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

in fairness i dont know what the us looked like in the 90s either.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

do you live in a cave? do you eat human flesh?we had a struggle session on why the word troglodytes is bad, ive heard the argument that cannibals are the real vegans. if you adhere to hexbearist thought you are in fact a chud.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

you probably must feel that weird feeling all those german kids felt when they asked their parents and grandparents what they did in the war. like both of us shouldnt have the right to exist for the sins of our parents but here we are, so basically we got to self obliterate ourselves in penance and use what privilege and wealth we have to fight for communism.

its definitely a special kind of person who has the means to move across the world, like there's economic necessity to move to a country that we consider like ultimately evil (or in canada case, a country trying to imitate its evil neighbor) but the economy good and you can send money back. but it has a cost on your metaphorical soul being here on your own volition. but like being second gen sort of takes that burden off you since you didnt choose to be here.

as for the white person thing, personally i kind of consider how far one is from being black to how close one is to being a direct beneficiary of colonialism. it would be wrong to rank it but pacific asian people tend to side with white people on all the wrong issues since they are so close to "whiteness". like in the united states at least (and by proxy canada) theres like a caste system and i feel like theres culpability for everyone except the direct bottom, who frankly are innocent in all the sins of this nation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

no great leftist movement has ever existed without a cult of personality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

i dont think hasan is a baby's first leftism. just because he is usually the first leftist political personality the youngins get introduced too doesnt mean theres people out there more left than him. hasan is basically as far left as you can get and is at the end of the pipeline more than anything.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (21 children)

is there criticism though? like if you dont like his streams you probably are a chud.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

hasan isnt a gateway, he is a leftist. as long as you ignore the contradictions of him living in a hollywood mansion and engaging in treat culture, the dude is a very important internet personality because hes basically using his immense wealth and privilege to do praxis like every day. hes a bourgeoisie class traitor like fredrich engles. nothing less than complete uncritical support for hasan should be from this website. he is far more influential here than the chapo podcast.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

im not trying to do a bi erasure, bi people are valid. im just saying as someone who was bi sexual who later became pan sexual after learning about the term i just think changing some of the letters around would be good ways to raise awareness about different genders and sexualities in the acronym. so many people know what lgbt is but they dont really know the plus part. the first four are really important to the broader conception of gender and sexual identity as a whole. look if we can change the flag i dont think the acronym is sacrosanct either, i do however think we need an acronym.

i think lesbian, gay, and bisexual should be lower on the acronym. i think trans people should be first since they are receiving most of the targeting and attacks out of any group in the community right now, i think pansexuals, asexuals, and nonbinaries could really benefit from a representation bump. TPAN, rolls off the tongue. we can keep lgbt too. nobody got rid of the pride flag after the progress flag. both can exist at the same time. i just think its a representation issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (26 children)

disagree, queer is not all encompassing. if you dont identify as queer but you still want to identify with the community the acronym is still the best descriptor. as for the order, i do support updating it by putting trans first and pushing bisexuals down the list in favor of pansexuals.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

angry-hex LEARN THE FUCKING ACRONYM!!!!

 

you will never die in revolutionary violence. you are not a threat to national security. your politics only advance the status quo. every action you take only jeopardizes real leftist movements further. that coffee you drank resulted in the deaths of 11 elite farc operatives in the jungles of columbia. you will not stand on a burning police car waving the trans flag while shouting into a microphone. you will not try to grab the gun of the police officer inside the 7/11 at 3 am. you will not write a poorly worded manifesto and post it online to have it be laughed at and your face immortalized into what the kids call a soyjack. you will die in relative obscurity from an automobile accident after hotboxing your car while driving down the highway in the middle of the night without your lights on. your car will swerve into a lake and will never be uncovered. your friends and family assumed you ran with some bad hombres from a site called hexbear. they will beg the police to follow through on investigating this website and uncover a web of conspiracies. the police will assume that you were kidnapped by a group of radical transgender feminist russian nationalist communist muslim black activists and presumably did a jonestown in the woods somewhere under the weight of your beliefs contradictions. once you are declared legally dead the last though anyone will ever ponder of you. of you your name. of your very being. will be. why is there a my little pony figurine drenched in cum inside a glass jar in this box of clothing donated to goodwill?

 

treats are the luxuries marx talked about ending the production of, but back then there wasnt really a consumer class that we have now, most of the luxuries were consumed by the upper classes, and what little luxuries the lower classes consumed, mainly alcohol, didnt account for much production.

so the problem is now, we got a large proletarian base enjoying nice thing, ie treats, as well as the still small upper class buying a shitlload of treats, so much treats they can never uses, yachts, jets, mcmansions, ferraris, while those are treats, treat discourse is entirely aimed at reducing the consumption of the proletariat consumers because we are a bunch of bourgeoisie communists living in brooklyn brownstones off our daddys allowances making podcasts with a alleged sex offender.

we want to abolish treats because treat production is literally killing the planet, but we want to consume the treats and will justify our consumption as being necessary because we are very important communist thinkers, we are massive hypocrites and do not do what we preach. we often bring up the concept of malthusianism, which we think is total bunk, with communism resources can be distributed to everyone evenly and a small portion can be siphoned off by high ranking party members to do blow on a private island.

the earth has a carrying capacity of 40 billion people if if we force 39,999,999,000 of them to live in giant archologies, basically massive buildings that can support millions of people inside through green energy and recycling without needing outside resources. basically we want people to like eat recycled poop to save the environment. we want them to live without even a toothbrush, no medical care, clothing, they all sleep on the floor in a communal sleeping room, and the vocal police kill anyone who has sex because nice things are treats, except when i consume them, because i am the ceo of communism.

some cool people even say breathing air is a treat, living is a treat. we think even basic necessities for human survival are treats because we are fucking insane and we created an entire political theory by doing a revisionism on a single paragraph in the communist manifesto.

and that, our federated comrades, is treat theory, please donate all your money to hasan piker and feel bad about that coffee you bought this morning you are literally hitler and satan combined for buying a cup of coffee. but you know im not. you would understand why if you read this whole fucking post, why would you read this instead of doing praxis? YOU ARENT DOING COMMUNISM HARD ENOUGH.

 

im not usually so insecure about my height but having to walk through several busloads of kids to get to my job today and not a single one of them being shorter than me hurt my ego. are they feeding these kids growth hormones? why are there six foot middle schoolers?

any other short people here feel my pain?

 

i would be a politican campaigning for free gasoline for all, if i can nationalize the petroleum industry i would, if i can get get control through appeasing the shareholders ill do that too. all that really matters is i would be a politican who has absolute control over the oil industry. to almost everyone i would appear to be pro-oil and pro-car, i would deny climate change, i would fight public transportation, i would ban high speed rail if that means i could stop all oil production with just a phone call, because there's a reason i want to control the oil industry.

i would put a chemical in the fuel supply that would slowly destroy engines over a period of months, if fuel is free then more cars would be destroyed. once people start to realize that the fuel is bad the damage would have already been done, at this point i would deflect any possible legal action towards me to my co-conspirators, and i would flee to an island where the law cant touch me for having done billions, possibly trillions in economic damage by destroying a good chunk of the worlds automobiles.

view more: ‹ prev next ›