[–] 0 points 3 months ago*

My original comment was poorly worded. Ghana gained independence 69 years ago, not 200.

The kidnapping and exploitation was in full swing 200 years ago, but it started earlier than that and ended way later, if ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Plunder a country

    Kidnap their people to make slaves

    Impose anti-gay laws on them

    200 years later: They are expanding the anti-gay laws! Why are they so backward?!

    Pay reparations or shut up.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 3 points 4 months ago

    My oversimplified and possibly wrong understanding: this is like speculative decoding, but instead of a separate draft model (which does its own prompt processing), they use some diffusion thing strapped on top of the main model. The diffusion reuses the high-quality prompt processing result of the main model.

    The 7.8x faster claim sounds almost too good to be true. But even if we get like 3x then this is still a huge revolution in localLLMing.

  • source
  • [–] 95 points 4 months ago* (9 children)

    1.5 hours runtime for like half a liter of gasoline?? That's unbelievably inefficient. A half-liter of gasoline is like 15MJ, should power a laptop drawing 30W for a week.

    Maybe it would be better with a fuel cell.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I see. Mistral was the favorite in self-hosted LLM circles back in 2023-2024 but general opinion is that they have since been far surpassed by Chinese and American models, hence my question.

    Good to know they've found a market with their online offering.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Reinforcement learning makes the model better over time, so why should there be fewer and fewer good results?

    If you're talking about the rate of improvement going down, then yes, of course. That's bound to happen (unless you have an actual intelligence explosion, but in that case you won't know what "good results" even mean anyway).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • "content curation" (thelemmy.club)
    submitted 7 months ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
     

    cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/46665693

    PieFed blocks !enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world (and a few other communities) by default. At the time of writing this post, you can search for the comm on many PieFed instances and you will not find it.

    The block is only by default. The admin can choose to override it. Many big instances have done so, including

    • piefed.social
    • piefed.world
    • piefed.zip

    See more information here.

     

    Please try to consolidate discussions in the thread linked below:

    Crossposted from https://mander.xyz/post/46586274

    It's not guaranteed that the FCC will be built yet. But if CERN decides to build it, then these people will chip in 860M EUR.

    The people in question are "a group of friends of CERN, including the Breakthrough Prize Foundation, The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation, and the entrepreneurs John Elkann and Xavier Niel".

     

    It's not guaranteed that the FCC will be built yet. But if CERN decides to build it, then these people will chip in 860M EUR.

    The people in question are "a group of friends of CERN, including the Breakthrough Prize Foundation, The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation, and the entrepreneurs John Elkann and Xavier Niel".

    Are you in the 95%? (thelemmy.club)
    submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/mathmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
     

    SpoilerMore like 99.9995%

    https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c2532359h2760821_the_emoji_problem__part_i

    solution:

    🍎 = 36875131794129999827197811565225474825492979968971970996283137471637224634055579
    🍌 = 154476802108746166441951315019919837485664325669565431700026634898253202035277999
    🍍 = 4373612677928697257861252602371390152816537558161613618621437993378423467772036
    

     

    A microblog post by @kareem_carr saying "as soon as i saw they were using asterisks for multiplication symbols, i knew we were in trouble", with an image from the "Office of the United States Trade Representative (Executive Office of the President)" showing the mathematical formula $\Delta \tau_i = \frac{x_i - m_i}{\varepsilon * \varphi * m_i}$. The formula show asterisks (*) instead of multiplication signs (×).

    view more: next ›