top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 196 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 166 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    So the development of inorganic intelligence, considered by many as an inflection point in human civilisation is to be handed to business graduates who are historically proven to be capable of any level of atrocity in the name of corporate greed. America, fuck yeah.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    America Greed, fuck yeah.

    Don't fool yourself. The USA lost the exclusivity deal on unchecked corpo greed a long time ago. This is a global issue now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 105 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 66 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Stop depending on these proprietary LLMs. Go to !localllama@sh.itjust.works.

    There are open-source LLMs you can run on your own computer if you have a powerful GPU. Models like OLMo and Falcon are made by true non-profits and universities, and they reach GPT-3.5 level of capability.

    There are also open-weight models that you can run locally and fine-tune to your liking (although these don’t have open-source training data or code). The best of these (Alibaba’s Qwen, Meta’s llama, Mistral, Deepseek, etc.) match and sometimes exceed GPT 4o capabilities.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Interesting. So they mix the requests between all DDG users before sending them to “underlying model providers”. The providers like OAI and Anthropic will likely log the requests, but mixing is still a big step forward. My question is what do they do with the open-weight models? Do they also use some external inference provider that may log the requests? Or does DDG control the inference process?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 63 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I thought they were a for-profit company all this time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Pretty much non-profit in name only. Some shady hybrid model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No problem, after they release all the data collected under the excuse of public good and progress.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [+] 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (63 children)
  • load more comments (57 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Booooooooooo!

    Anyway: ill just keep using alpaca to run llms locally

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There was never another outcome.

    Capitalism breeds one thing, and it certainly isn't innovation, and it most definitely isnt not-for-profit innovation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Hahaha. April 1st is early this year.
    They are never going to make enough money by selling licenses and subscriptions for the cost of their current models (smarter people than me have made good estimates), let alone the future ones. Those future models are at a much worse performance-cost ratio. Ads will at best bring in about 1 usd per user per month (estimated by Facebook revenue and number of users) - double or triple it just for lolz, and they would still be losing money.
    So… how will this be pulled off? Only wrong answers!

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    No kidding. 🙀

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Didnt they do this like a year ago

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Lol like it wasn't always.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This is going to sound weird but so is the internet their icon suggests a chain of bodies eating out the ass of the one in front of them which to me seems apt for the product

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›