01189998819991197253

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The antipsychotics?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yeah.... Neosporin is WAY too weak for this burn. Holy crap hahahahaha

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Looks like Salvador Vulcano.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is highly unrealistic. The working man has a cookie? A whole one? It's not believable. A fourth of a cookie, maybe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Nice! Makes it even better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Pun intended, I'm assuming?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

These two remind me of the early Apple fanboys, completely talking around all the bad parts and focusing only on perceived good parts. Except, here, they're fan-ing on a decision that was made a long time ago (using tempered glass on side windows) for exactly the reason they state is 'bad'--it explodes into a bunch of non-sharp shards. This decision was made, and agreed upon by auto manufacturers, to prevent people getting stuck in cars on fire. Internal mechanical releases do nothing when the person inside is unconscious or is a toddler, as is in this case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I agree. If ff becomes for-profit or starts actively treating the browser as for-profit, it's only a matter of time before it becomes just as bad as google. Worse, even, since they were once actually good and their turn to the dark side will be perceived as an ultimate betrayal.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But supporting chromium is supporting chrome, which supports google. Not directly, of course, and certainly better than direct chrome, but the underlying methodology is identical. The ff management that caused this to happen should be blacklisted (I'd even support them imprisoned over this). However, knocking ff completely out (including any browser built on it) is not good, imo, as it strengthens Google's chrome's/chromium's hold on the browser market, creating a true browser monopoly. Right now, chromium is open source, but if google becomes a true browser monopoly, how long do you think chromium's FOSS status will hold? I'm going to venture, not very long. I just never thought I'd have to choose between evil and more evil when selecting my browser...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

As bad as this is if true (and it's abhorrent), is google really any better with how they continuously treat their employees and their produc--er... customers?

view more: ‹ prev next ›