The Federal Crime Bill & African-American Community - 1994 (www.c-span.org)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It's very frustrating watching knowing that quite literally everything bad that they said would happen in this hearing does in fact happen. They even directly point out that more cops will not reduce crime. I know 1994 and 2024 are two radically different time periods but goddamn. This bill has was fundamental to the expansion of the carceral and surveillance state.

It's a really long watch but I think it's worth watching. It's very long and dry and boring, but it's very insightful. I have seen clips of this C-SPAN broadcast in many different video political essays and such and never have I seen it in its entirety.

I think about this not just as it's an election year, or not even really about the DNC; Instead, I think about this is respect to all of the people who were hurt when they cranked up the police machine to 11.

( Just a reminder this isn't just a POC issue either. "Funny fact about a cage, they're never built for just one group...")

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

"This bill has was fundamental to the expansion of the carceral and surveillance state."

Practically a milestone.

The 1990s was a "counter-revolution" in some senses from the civil rights era.

Clinton was Reaganism on steroids. At least, we had the anti-apartheid movement in the United States which culiminated in Congress passing sanctions on apartheid South Africa (back in 1986). Compare that with the next decade, the 1990s, and you begin to see that while neoliberalism may have been introduced 40 or 50 years ago, it doesn't really gain a foothold like it did during the 1990s. And that included the mass expansion of prison labor and a type of neo-slavery. The 1990s are the beginning of that.

(Not that prison slavery wasn't present before, but I think it's good to mark milestones and when things are an "escalation" of some sort.)

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Clintonism was the moment that large-D Democrats submitted themselves whole-heartedly to the neo-conservative revanchist white supremacy project. This was the dam breaking for civil rights leaders of the era.

For all we talk about guys like Malcolm X and Fred Hampton, I have to wonder how many black civil rights leaders of the 90s/00s/10s we'll never get to hear about because it was not in vogue to document and evangelize their message. Instead, we got a bunch of old Al Shaprton style hacks doing MSNBC talking head shows, a brash new Obama who was willing to put a black face on a white supremacist project, and a bunch of black prisoners/victims of police brutality who became martyrs for the cause only after they'd had their lives taken.

I also can't ignore how much of the African American proletariat has been incorporated within the system of criminalization and what that's done to civil rights as a project. In Houston, in particular, its easy to miss how many beat cops and prison guards are - themselves - black men, radicalized and mobilized into conflict with their own neighbors. We really are paying one half of the country to fight the other half. Black politicians in my city surround themselves with black security guards and allies in the HPD, in no small part because they see themselves at odds with the more overt white nationalist project of the state (and, by turns, federal) government. And these are the folks who are supposed to represent the community at-large.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

When Minneapolis finally decided to go in and rip apart George Floyd square they got a group called "Agape", a black, idk, street intervention group? I'm not sure what to call it. But they got them to go in first, while dozens of cops waited just out of sight, so what the cameras would see was people from the square yelling at black men from a christian organization, instead of fighting off a wall of cops. And, meanwhile, dozens and dozens of cops, armed and armored, ready to pour in the moment they had an excuse. I guess, from a marketing standpoint, it was really slick.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Clinton was Reaganism on steroids. At least, we had the anti-apartheid movement in the United States which culiminated in Congress passing sanctions on apartheid South Africa (back in 1986). Compare that with the next decade, the 1990s, and you begin to see that while neoliberalism may have been introduced 40 or 50 years ago, it doesn't really gain a foothold like it did during the 1990s. And that included the mass expansion of prison labor and a type of neo-slavery. The 1990s are the beginning of that.

Nothing to add, just want to point out this is an great historical context.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you!

Yeah, I try to demarcate certain periods in history (while also trying to unify them in their, well, context with each other).

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, and I guess I'll save this to my bookmarks.

Thanks!

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024

21 points (100.0% liked)

Ethnic Minorities and People of Color

1560 readers

16 users here now

Official Title of this Community: Ethnic Minorities and People of Color

Why is the title different?

We like to have fun here.

What is this place? A safe space for underrepresented peoples and peoples of color to talk, chill, and vibe.

What are the basic rules of the community?

Follow Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines. Non negotiable. This is the bedrock and mods will make decisions with this always in mind.
This community is for ethnic minorities and people of color. This is a safe space where such people can freely discuss their struggles, insight, and thoughts without fear. If you are not, we respectfully ask you do not post or comment here. A future community will be established to allow for racial discussions with a mixed userbase. However, remember, comments here must still respect Lemmy TOS and Community Guidelines.
Irony Racism is still racism. Racism is bad m'kay? We will treat irony racism and bad faith racist satire as racism. Will wield the ban hammer accordingly.
No sectarianism: This is an identity channel not a channel for you all to complain about why XYZ isn't the "one true leftism". Take that to another place.
Stupidpol is not allowed. Stupidpol is class reductionist. We are an identity community. Thinking like stupidpol ignores the struggles of the oppressed, their voices, and their need for unique support. Nothing says oppression more than someone saying that the identity you have is "not real" and that if you only thought like them you'd see what your "real" identity is. Mods reserve the right to ban users and content who promote stupidpol, stupidpol memes, and other class reductionist thinking.

FAQ

I don't look XYZ and/or sometimes I can pass as white so I don't know if I can post here. Can I?

This place is for ethnic minorities and people of color. This includes those of mixed heritage and those who may be "white" but are of an ethnicity that is a minority in their area (i.e. Kurds, etc) If you've experienced oppression due to your identity that is not based on sexual / gender identification, you are welcome here.
Moreover, for our American audience, we have people from around the world who are "white" but are oppressed due to being a minority in their country. They are and should be welcomed here.

What can I post?

Anything you think is relevant to the mission of this community. Things will evolve over time.
Topics and things relevant to EM and POC.