185
Pentagon hit by ‘critical compromise’ of US air force communications – report
(www.theguardian.com)
The warrant also recounted how witnesses and co-workers informed investigators that the engineer had allegedly “sold radios and radio equipment, worked odd hours, was arrogant, frequently lied, displayed inappropriate workplace behavior and sexual harassment, had financial problems, and possessed [Arnold air force base land mobile radio] equipment”.
. . . Investigators also reported to have found evidence which indicated that the searched contractor had possible access to FBI communications, as well as Tennessee state agencies, Forbes reported. The FBI is working alongside the air force on the investigation, according to the outlet.
. . . The Forbes report comes only three months after one of the worst leaks in US intelligence in over a decade. In that case, 21-year-old Jack Teixeira, an air national guardsman at the time, was arrested on suspicion of leaking hundreds of Pentagon documents.
He has since been charged under the Espionage Act.
Whatcha got there is one o’ them MAGAnazis.
They got done by one of their own contractors who had a bunch of conduct complaints. Maybe they shouldn't have outsourced that particular piece of government work?
Sounds like a domestic terrorist.
I wonder if this relates to the recent hacking technique on Law Enforcement radios? Like is he using the vulnerability I wonder.
If you're talking about the TETRA flaw that made news recently, it's unlikely to be related. The employee in the article is in the USA where TETRA is not widely used. Can't rule it out without more details but from what's written, it sounds like he had legitimate access to the information and tools through his workplace and decided to incorporate it into his hobbies. P25 is more common for encrypted voice and text over radio within US military and law enforcement agencies. It has vulnerabilities too but the reporting on those issues is a bit older so probably won't make headlines again until something new comes out.
It makes sense that he'd have the information for military-related communications if that was part of his job (though it should have been left at work). As for the FBI and state agencies, those details could have been in the plans for Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA) operations. It's the sort of thing you can figure out ahead of time so you're not scrambling to put it all together when the world is on fire. If they've rehearsed those scenarios with local and federal partners in the past, any officer worth their shiny collar would identify the need for seamless communication in order to coordinate response efforts more effectively.
Why is this downvoted? Legitimately, I don't know enough about this subject matter to discern why people are disagreeing with this poster, and why the disagreement isn't being verbalized.
I upset somebody and their friends / sockpuppets.
It seems like somebody doesn't like our conversation
It's not just this discussion, they've been checking in on my profile a few times a day recently (or running a script to take out the tedious parts) and voting most of my comments down to zero or slightly negative. I think they've got about 30 accounts to work with. Kinda telling when they hit comments in removed posts along with the ones that are still available.
There's no real harm in it and I'm not willing to spin up some bots of my own to balance the scales. Mostly just interested in seeing why and how they operate so my internet points are a small price to pay.
Anyway, the radio stuff is pretty cool once you separate out the crimes and national security implications. You mentioned not knowing enough about these topics so, while I'm far from an expert on these systems, I have had some jobs and hobbies that give me a peripheral awareness of how the pieces of the article fit together. If there are any parts you'd like to know more about, I could at least point you toward some resources on the subject.
Good. Now do Trump.
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
185 points (97.4% liked)
News
36850 readers
2228 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS