this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
203 points (93.6% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 155 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Is this Matt Gaetz the pedophile?

[–] [email protected] 98 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yep, rapist and sex trafficker Matt Gaetz.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

This got me thinking:

Would Epstein have been considered a kiddie sommelier?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

One of them, certainly

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Yes that Matt.

[–] [email protected] 135 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Child sex trafficker Matt Gaetz?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

The very same!

[–] [email protected] 89 points 9 months ago (3 children)

How tf this rapist outta jail

[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Do you remember the Senator's pedophile son in Sin City? Well look no further than the literal Senator's son Gaetz.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Posted this last night:

He's my Congressman, been following this from day-1. Nothing is going to happen, or it already would have.

His dirtbag friend, who was supposed to roll on conviction, was convicted, and did not. The girl in question, 17 at the time, is now an adult with an OnlyFans site. Not a good look for the prosecution, and she refuses to testify.

If you were paying attention in NW Florida, Gaetz STFU real quick while under investigation. Suddenly, The Mouth from the South was at it again. He's safe. He knows it.

This "investigation" is another stab at him since he's been acting the ass. Maybe they got an angle on him this time, but don't hold your breath.

Sorry folks. He's skating this. The man is certainly guilty of far more than fucking a girl <365 days from adulthood, but we got nothing that sticks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

FYI, they have new witnesses & these don't come with the baggage of an OnlyFans account.

https://newrepublic.com/post/178337/trouble-matt-gaetz-house-ethics-new-witnesses-sex-drug-charges

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that won't go anywhere

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I read somewhere they had received testimony from another victim, one without an OnlyFans, but I have no idea if that was true or not.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) told Newsmax that "for every Karen we lose, there's a Julio and a Jamal ready to sign up for the MAGA movement" in 2024.

Isn't this just racism and sexism directed at everybody? He just called white non-MAGA Republican women "Karens" while simultaneously using Hispanic names in a backhandedly insulting way.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Well now.....you learn something new every day. Thanks for that.

(I work in a school district with an overwhelmingly Hispanic population. There are over 50 kids in my district with the first name Jamal and only one of them has an Arabic last name. Most of the others have Hispanic last names. I never knew the name was actually Arabic in origin.)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

That's interesting too! I live in West Los Angeles and the only Jamal I know is Iranian. Looking online though, except for the murdered journalist Jamal Kashoggi, I'm seeing mostly Black sports stars. So, still racist, as expected.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For the racists, Jamal is considered a stereotypical black name.

Also, why do I suspect that the sex trafficker of minors pronounces Julio as "jool-ee-o"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Not just racists. For lots of Americans the only exposure to the name is African Americans. That in and of itself isn’t racist. Not to say they don’t take it to a racist place but still

[–] [email protected] 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Fortunately, Gaetz is rarely correct about anything.

Recap on what has occurred recently in consensual reality due to the #GOP rejecting women:

Nationwide, Democrats are beating polls by 9+ points at the ballot box since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

GOP has lost 13 of their last 15 special elections, even in "red" states.

State GOP groups are going bankrupt in an election year.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The unfortunate truth is, all that doesn't matter if the Electoral College utterly fails at its ONE job yet again and picks the loser. Republicans will userp power wether we want them to or not if that happens. They need to be treated as the enemies of the state they are, or else we're fucked.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

all that doesn't matter if the Electoral College ~~utterly fails~~ succeeds at its ONE job yet again and picks the loser.

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They're supposed to protect from terrible leaders, not simply to pick the loser. Electing Trump was the perfect demonstration of how the entire concept is utterly and completely flawed.

He should've been able to win the popular vote and still should have been ignored by the Electoral College. Instead, the exact opposite happened. They're worse than useless.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The electoral college exists to subvert the popular vote whenever the choice of the rural minority is behind. It would have no reason to exist otherwise. It has no duty to "ignore" any outcome and nothing to do with the quality of leadership besides their ability to campaign to low density populations.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yea, it's effectively a tool of disenfranchisement, but the point is it was pitched as a safety mechanism from the "dumb plebs", yet it has done the exact opposite.

It wasn't the plebs that put Trump in office. The point I'm making is it literally has zero upsides.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The point I'm making is it literally has zero upsides.

Then we're literally making the same point. There is no reason to argue here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nationwide, Democrats are beating polls by 9+ points at the ballot box since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Nitpick: Nationwide polls don't matter. This race is again going to come down to a few tens of thousands of votes in a handful of swing states, and in those states, Trump is either much closer or actually in the lead.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're missing the point. Their current polling for those places is also skewed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Michigan GOP is out of cash. Michigan is very much a purple/battleground state.

I really hope this is the death knell of the GOP. At this point, it needs to die. If our idiotic fucking political system was less focused on maintaining the two-party dynamic, that’d be great too, but at this point I’m just gonna call it a win if we can stop the Nazis from getting into office.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Diversity, equity, and inclusion. It's an overall banner for corporate initiatives to avoid being as racist and sexist etc as they have previously been.

This of course seen as a horrifying affront to a bunch of white men who formerly benefitted from the racism and sexism.

You can guess which party is on which side of the debate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Diversity, equity, and inclusion

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago

Why does he look like a wax sculpture of himself?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There's also a Julio and a Jamal ready for him in prison.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because those are the names of "ethnic people." Am I right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

That's how you know he's not racist

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Just look at that cunts face.... How can anyone vote for that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

The amount of propaganda that right-trash spews into S Florida is nuts. And those folks are pretty helpless against it as they cannibalize their own fairly regularly.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

For every pedo rapist politician there is... Another one or more that are just as bad?

[–] Birdie 7 points 9 months ago

This is the one circumstance in which I'd be proud to be called a Karen.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like how he thinks he knows women

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

He knows teenage girls. That's almost knowing women.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

"There's a sucker born every minute."

- David Hannum (not P.T. Barnum)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

After 2020 and 2022, I'm just waiting for this sudden change of heart from traditionally strong Democratic demographics.. Seems like copium from Gaetz.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›