TL;DR: Americans now need to make $120K a year to afford a typical middle-class life and qualify to purchase a home. Minimum.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 243 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Where we failed is that $120k was supposed to be a middle-class income when living costs this much. The fact the median is 63k is a sign that all the excess value has been sucked out of the masses and funneled into the coffers of the billionaire class.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 124 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    100% this. It's not that costs rose as much as it's that salaries didn't increase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    In the late 70s around 23% of US corporate revenues went to pay salaries. By 2012 that had fallen to 7% - in other words, just before neoliberalism really took off almost 1/4 of the money workers spent buying goods from US companies was almost directly back in workers' pockets, whilst by 2012 less that 1/14 of what workers spent buying goods from US companies ended back in workers' pockets.

    All that excess money that doesn't get recycled back to workers anymore has got to be pooling somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] [S] 174 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (20 children)

    I honestly don't even know why this upsets me so much. I am 50 and all set. I don't have children and barely any debt. I never considered myself particularly patriotic but somehow this whole thing gets under my skin. I guess it sours my achievements and fruits of decades of struggle (it took three generations of planning and hustle to get us out of poverty). It's like being a kid having a birthday party at Chuck E Cheese by yourself while all your friends are locked outside and you can see them through the glass windows.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 110 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It gets under my skin because the west was on the right trajectory; improving wealth equality, quality of life, work life balance, etc — Then Capitalists killed all those gains using Conservatism, Neoliberalism, and a bastardised version of Libertarianism — just to enrich a tiny percentage the human population and return the rest of humanity to feudalism.

    Why should they own all the gains from humanities collective efforts, when all of us have a rightful claim to a share of those gains?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago

    In the early 1900s we had huge fights for labor. Strikes yes, but also some literal armed fights.

    We won a lot. They conceded a lot.

    But they've eroded those wins, little by little, for a century or so.

    This is what will ALWAYS happen when you live in a system explicitly designed to extract profit from workers and reward greed. It cannot be reformed. It cannot be controlled. It will always slide backwards into this. We need a different system altogether.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Wanting other people to have what you have, without your struggle, is an opinion we need more of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 96 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Here's what happened in a nutshell.

    Lyndon Johnson had great plans for the US, but wanted to win the Vietnam War with one huge push. That quickly turned into a giant quagmire. LBJ and later Nixon, ordered bombing of the North. That meant the US factories were working 24/7. Nice for factory owners and union workers, but LBJ was paying for it with paper money because he didn't want to raise taxes. Ironically, Nixon ran for President as an anti inflation and pro peace candidate.

    Nixon and Kissinger doubled down on the bombing and inflation started to spiral. Also, those factories were getting a bit worn down. Unable to met the deamnd for the bombing and supply foreign markets the US ceded local steel making to Germany and Japan. This is going to bite the US in the ass when the Arab Oil boycott hits. US steel is much more oil dependant than the newer factories, so suddenly Toyotas and VWs are the hot cars, and US manufacturing takes a huge hit.

    Carter tried to control inflation and cut oil use, but got kicked out over the Iran hostage mess. Reagan came in and cut taxes for the rich. This increased the debt, but gave the economy an unrealistic jolt.

    tl dr. In 1960, minimum wage was $1.00/hour. The average house was $11,000.00 and $1 million was considered a vast fortune.* Middle class meant a High School graduate with a Union job supporting a family of four.

    By the time Nixon, Reagan and Bush Sr were done, 'middle class' was two college degrees supporting the house and $1 million was what a rich guy paid for a party.

    • In case anyone tells you that $1 million is 1960 would be $10 million today, tell them that in 1960, $100,000 would buy a mansion in Beverly Hills.
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The massive difference in the purchasing power of what the Official Inflation Figures tell us - when we used them to adjust an amount of money at a past date for inflation over the years and get a supposedly equivalent present day amount - is the same salary now as in 1960, shows just how fake Official Inflation Figures are.

    The reason for Official Inflation Figures being so much bullshit and always on the understating inflation side, is because the lower the Inflation used in calculating the Official GDP figures, the higher that latter figure gets.

    All that talk of GDP Growth in the last few decades is the product of some very consistent (and hence likely purposeful) understating of the Inflation so that the Maths used to produce the Real (i.e. Official) GDP output a higher number hence politician can proudly declare GDP is growing strongly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 57 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    https://www.rd.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fact-sheet/508_RD_FS_RHS_SFH502Direct.pdf

    the federal government will loan you the money for the house at below market rates, and if their rate is still too expensive, they can give you a deferment.

    my effective interest rate today is 1%.

    please take money from the federal government.

    fuck the banks.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Lots of sellers will prefer cash or regular loans so your application is very likely to be last in line. Plus the applications are much, much more complicated and mortgage applications are already a bitch. But then it's usually a once in a lifetime experience and may be the only option for a lot of people do this is more of a heads up than an attempt to discourage anyone from applying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Smith explained how, just a few years ago, $60-$70K a year would have been sufficient to qualify for a home.

    Yeah, no. It was more than a few years ago.

    I think that this has been trouble since 2007. Financial institutions went from giving lots of home loans to only giving corporations and the elite loans.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I don't have a full Orlando market research report but pre-pandemic (2018) you could get a house in my neighborhood (Davenport) for $265k-325k. In 2024 the starting price is ~$650k. In 2018 I bought a house (Orlando) for my aunt to live in for $150k. After buying the little bungalow, I saw the rest of that neighbohood get gobbled up by investment funds and now it is almost completely rentals. The current comps have it at $325k.

    Homes were dirt cheap from 2009 until about 2013, but everyone was broke. Prices were reasonable from 2014 to maybe 2018 (maybe). The post lockdown boom and investment fund buying spree has been insane.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    This happened because people were lulled into voting for the very people who gave their fair share of corporate profits to the rich. Looking at you, Republicans, especially Ronald Reagan.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    You can argue that Democrats inability to support the working class and unions helped to kill the American dream. “Both sides” are capitalists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Poor tax laws on the richest 1% killed the American Dream.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    A friend was looking at getting a home lately and I offered to look into co-signing with them, so we gave our information to see what they would qualify for. With both of our details, they offered them a home loan of something like $100k, really not even enough to get anything that's on the market now except for the worst crack houses possible. I then looked at what would be possible if I just applied by myself and if I applied for a home loan for a place that I would rent out. Not sure if it was considered a business loan, but I wouldn't be the occupant, it would be an investment property for me. Suddenly, by myself, I qualified for a $300k loan, same loan agency, just different terms. I do have great credit, so maybe that helped, it's just weird how they come up with the numbers sometimes. Like you would think two people together would qualify for more than what a single person would qualify for.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I mean, operated as an investment property they have near certainty you will have a stable income source (the tenant) so it makes sense that the loan value is higher. You're guaranteed to have the income of the rent checks and just as likely all your other potential income on top of that. You actually can afford higher mortgage payments in that situation -- and substantially so.

    Which is a strong, strong, strong argument why all cities which have housing shortages (basically all cities) should be exercising policies that discourage non-owner-occupied properties.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 42 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    TL;DR: Americans now need to make $120K a year to afford a typical middle-class life and qualify to purchase a home. Minimum.

    Maybe in the middle of nowhere America. Meanwhile my wife and I make well above that in Los Angeles and we can't afford the monthly on a two bedroom house in a sketchy neighborhood.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Good thing investment "firms" are buying up all the rental properties, right, guys? Neofeudalism for the win!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    This is what happens when most people think the disparity in wealth should grow.

    It does.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Mr Realtor can blame his own industry for a good portion of the problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 27 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Just a reminder that high prices are a markets signal to build more.

    Let people build housing, is it too much to ask for?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Smith explained how, just a few years ago, $60-$70K a year would have been sufficient to qualify for a home.

    "Most people are carrying student loan debt, which is at an all-time high, and the average payment in the country is $500 a month for your college degree. [There are] some people I'm seeing in my comment section saying ‘$500, I wish, it was $1,200 a month for me’," said Smith.

    "If you are someone who bought a house before 2020 and you have it paid off or you have a 3% interest rate, you are not burdened by the housing costs like the 2024 adults are now," the relator said, explaining how debt, especially college debt, housing costs and childcare are burdening millennials and Gen Zers starting their lives.

    It’s scary how everything seemed to change so fast, yet the ingredients for this very situation have been simmering for some time. It’s no coincidence that since student loans ballooned it didn’t take much for the dominoes to really begin to fall and have drastic effects on everything else downstream.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    If you want the results of the American dream the only way to do so is crime. Probably always been true, but boy is it truer than ever now.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yet disability pays $11k a YEAR that'sthe same as $5.42/hour.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (25 children)

    Note that the source of this opinion piece is TikTok. The salary needed for a middle class existence varies wildly from city to city.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Doesn't help that corporations own 27% of single family homes.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›