176

Navy Federal rejected more than half of black applicants for mortgages (www.cnn.com)

submitted 2 years ago by Yamainwitch@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm not super happy with the lack of supporting data, just colorful graphs and a lot of emotional anecdotes but there is a clear disparity that I think warrants greater investigation. I love the credit union movement and was shocked to read this article. I would love to hear your opinions lemmings!

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] wyrmroot@programming.dev 50 points 2 years ago

With respect to data, there does seem to be a damning amount of it in the CFPB dataset they analyzed for the article. The fact that approvals were this disproportionate even when accounting for “income, debt-to-income ratio, property value, downpayment percentage, and neighborhood characteristics” is alarming. Specifically with respect to income, approval for lowest-quartile whites exceeded that of highest quartile blacks. Yes, credit score was not available in the dataset, but we know it doesn’t fully explain the gap because of its frequency as a cited reason for denial, and reliance on credit doesn’t really do much to dig NFCU out of this hole IMO.

I’m tempted to agree with the authors assessment that the use of automated tools by the underwriters is a likely contributor. Use a tool trained on historically racist data and practices, and that’s what you’ll get more of.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

We have a saying at work regarding data, “garbage in, garbage out”. If they’re using clearly racist historical data they deserve this shitstorm. They really should have known better

[-] MechanicalJester@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

That's a rather old and common concept. GIGO

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You’re not wrong, work’s just the first place I heard it

[-] MechanicalJester@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

As long as you're not a software engineer with a decade of experience in, I ain't shook.

If you are, then I am not mad at you- just whoever was supposed to teach or mentor you.

[-] corroded@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

How would a bank or credit union even know what racial background a loan applicant comes from? I have a mortgage, and I've had auto loans and personal loans in the past. Not once did I ever see a bank employee face-to-face, even for my mortgage.

A suppose the sound of a person's voice or their name could give some clues on certain occasions.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

In the US lots of forms have race or ethnicity input fields. It always baffles me as a European. Like how is that relevant, except for discrimination.

[-] zigmus64@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

I think the logic is to track data like this… I’ve never understood it either though…

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

We're tracking the data to prove we're going to do what you said we're going to do.

[-] MechanicalJester@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Very much for this. In schools in decent states the students self identity. That is then used to look for over representation in suspension or expulsion.

How else can mathematically prove bias or discrimination?

Individually, the ethnicity is known or presumed by staff but without it being known systemically it can't be addressed systemically.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

It's easier to ask for it upfront and ban companies from using than try and reconstruct the data to analyze after the fact. There scale of discrimination was so severe in housing the government forces this information to be collected and reported for all applications, because it's easier to detect the discrimination that way. There's also penalties for not submitting the race or ethnicity on enough applications.

[-] bassomitron@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Creditors have access to your entire life in the background. So even if your loan application doesn't have race/ethnicity on it, your credit file sure as hell does.

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Equfax knows a whole lot about you, more than just your race.

[-] ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago

They run your information against a number of services when you apply for a loan. That data is 100% available to them. Source: I work with this data daily.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Like the author says this is probably due to how automated systems were trained. They weren't made to be racist, but based on certain traits are more likely to reject, and that ends up making them discriminate against black applicants. I'm thinking: neighborhood, street, schools attended, stuff like that.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Systemic racism strikes again!

[-] MechanicalJester@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

They tried to make their decisions too clever. The analysis of personal background beyond basic measures is a problem. That additional analysis is where biases breed.

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023

176 points (96.8% liked)

News

35687 readers

2962 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world