147
'If you can’t show your game to the world without fearing it’ll be cloned, something’s broken' says Moonlighter studio on its canceled demo (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 20 hours ago by to c/games@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 hour ago

I understand his sentiment but only now mentioning that something is broken? Something has been broken for a very long while already.

Only now bigger companies are feeling the results of it. However, very unfortunately also smaller companies, developers/ indie-developers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 10 points 6 hours ago

    Yeah, I heard an interview with Lucas Pope where he was saying he was working on something but wouldn't be telling anyone anything about it - because he didn't want a hundred crappy copies of whatever innovative idea he has, before his game is even published.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 28 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

    Yea. This year's Next Fest on Steam is just fucking sad with how much AI slop clones are clogging it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    My question is who would actually buy the clones anyway? It's not really like the old days where you can scam old people with a handheld gamebox360, surely most people savvy enough to use steam are going to support the indie Dev or just pirate the game outright?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago

    It took me a few moments to work out what the feeling was looking over NextFest. Once I did, I joined the groaning online discourse. But a lot of people view Steam browsing more casually, and don’t have such forums.

    The exact moment of “I’ve been fooled!” is unclear too. Many genuine indie devs have traditionally put out half-functional games, so it’s nothing new, and sometimes you just get what you pay for.

    But Steam’s gotta do something about this or it’s going to degrade the value of the store.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 44 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

    Wow, it's almost as if AI ruins fucking everything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 24 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

    it's people. people ruin everything

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    No shit. This has been a problem with movies for decades. Somebody starts on an idea, and there's already another studio trying to clone that idea. Blade and Vampires. Antz and A Bug's Life.

    And then when it comes out and is successful enough, you have all of the straight-to-video clones, and a couple of porn clones.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 35 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

    This is why we can't have nice things. The fact that people still see nothing wrong with this is infuriating.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

    Every time a new medium opens for new people, a ton of crap is generated and everyon is shouting about the end times. And yet, we're still here.

    The game dev ecosystem is already 99% crap. Open the playstore if you don't believe me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

    Didn't realize the bar minimum to expect of a technology is not killing everyone. I guess if you lower the bar down to "not committing mass genocide" then it's a lot easier to like every new tech regardless of any other standard.

    As far as I see it LLMs and vibe coding will not prevent people from coding by hand, but they will enable people to steal far, far more easily than they ever could before.

    If something built an Automatic Lock Picker 3000, able to pick any lock in the world at an 80% success rate otherwise just try again ad nauseam, then a lot more people will steal shit. People obviously could steal before the ALP3000's release, but it wasn't trivial for just anyone to do beforehand. Now it is.

    In a similar vein I think LLMs trivialize the process by which people can "steal" concepts. It's pretty damn demoralizing to know that you spent months to years working on a game, start promoting it, then someone with a Claude subscription can make their own clone of your game then sweep the rug out from under your feet. You're trying to build a good and successful game, then you could easily have legitimate claims that you're the clone since someone else released something similar several weeks before you did.

    That's not even to mention all of the code and other assets GenAI stole without consent in order to enable these vibe coders to steal your ideas your ideas.

    No it's not going to be the end of the world (but it sure will enable climate change) but it's going to make things a lot worse for the people who actually care to craft something good while enabling the people who only care about having that thing done.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (1 child)

    If something built an Automatic Lock Picker 3000...

    Just an interesting tidbit: something similar to this already exists. It won't pick any lock, but it makes picking the majority of locks dead simple.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago*

    Yep, I'm familiar with it, though I've never used one before. I don't think it's as accessible right now as LLMs are considering its a fairly bulky physical device one would need to bring with them to any locks, and to my knowledge I believe it'll still struggle with security bits which I believe are fairly common.

    I guess a better comparison would have been something like some "Pickless Lockpicking App" to emphasize that such a thing would have similar accessibility to LLMs, but much further than that and the comparison starts to break down.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    I don't think you can own ideas and concepts (outside of very specific circumstances) and I'm willing to die on this hill.

    It would be hypocritical of me to change my mind just because piracy has become mainstream.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago

    I don't disagree with that, but my point is more along the lines of enabling low effort "theft" (or if you so dislike that term then perhaps "cloning" would better suit your tastes) demoralizes and thereby disincentivizes high effort creative works, on top of making high effort work harder to find by muddying the waters they're both going to be put in.

    Suppose I put in the work to craft a brand new style of game. Something that nobody has ever seen before. I now have to promote it in order to get sales, but by promoting it vibe coders now see it and can make a low effort clone. Because these particular vibe coders are trying to cash in on the hype I'm trying to build up they don't necessarily care about quality, only about getting a return on the investment I put in on designing my original idea, so they're able to produce something functional and ship it within the weeks of time I'm trying to use to build up a fanbase.

    Depending on the success of my marketing, how much time I dedicated to marketing before release, the technical requirements to execute my game design, etc then I might still have a successful game and people are able to recognize the difference in quality between my games and the slop cash grabs but I also might now be fighting an uphill battle against the reputation the slop cash grabs have created around my original game design. What incentive do I then have the next time I come up with a new idea for a game?

    Getting back to reality, I think many people can recognize a cash grab when they see it but I still think that LLMs enabling them made the already existing visibility problem for indie devs so very much worse.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [+] -51 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

    If you think it can be cloned that fast why do you need a demo? Use AI to finish it and release now if it's so easy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 28 points 13 hours ago

    Accurate name there mate.

    If they use ai to make their game, it becomes soulless ai slop like the rest of it. The people copying their game aren't making anything good or even worth playing, and the intent isn't for it to be good. They're just making slop to siphon sales away from the original game, while cashing in on someone else's idea. And in the meantime it clogs up the marketplaces and pushes legitimate games down in the listings so it's harder to get seen, while also making your game look like part of the slop. Not to mention it's just straight up ip theft at that point.

    I've seen the exact same thing play out on every market place. Ai has just made it possible to do it faster, and with games. I made a sticker design and listed it on redbubble. It was pretty popular, sold quite a bit. The instant it started getting rankings, people/bots screen shot the design and uploaded it again themselves. Pushed my listing all the way down by gaming the SEO and the sales dried up.

    Same thing on Etsy. Made handmade jewellery. People stole the designs, made cheap imitations in China and sold them for a fraction of the cost, cheaper than I could produce them for because I was using real gold/silver. But in the meantime my legitimate listing was pushing all the way down.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent