Snip:

Speaking to Press TV, the regional source said the “absurd scenario” involving the hijacking of an Emirati aircraft bound for the occupied territories from the UAE, followed by its landing in Saudi Arabia, was carried out on Wednesday, three days after Netanyahu travelled to the United Arab Emirates accompanied by several senior military and intelligence officials.

The project, the informed source said, was discussed and finalized during the visit.

According to the source, during that visit, in addition to the UAE being tasked with playing a role in the Israeli regime’s regional projects, multilateral talks were held with officials from several other Arab countries to devise a false-flag operation and attribute it to Iran.

The source said the objective of the operation is to force Trump into a new quagmire and trigger a new round of war against Iran.

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

"New war with Iran" motherfucker you're losing the CURRENT WAR!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

    New war with Ira- THERE'S ALREADY A PREEXISTING WAR STILL GOING ON!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • I mean, they got away with 9/11 so

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 hours ago

    Steven Spielberg should make a Sequel to Munich about this.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 hours ago

    idiotic question but will israhell use the plane fiasco as an excuse to unleash the samson doctrine? been unable to feel joy since realizing this truth (idiot fuckwad scared of dying instead of mourning the global south)

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 hours ago

    They have really lost their showmanship

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    This and those guys in the UK happening so close to each other does raise some eyebrows

    Not to mention, it is profoundly Israeli to stage a false flag where no Israelis are actually harmed

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago

    I’m not one for conspiracy bullshit but I personally read the plane incident as a forced “opportunity” for the entity and the kingdom to open a dialogue in the public eye and get some PR from photos of doctors from there treating people from the plane.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
    [–] -4 points 6 hours ago (11 children)

    From Wikipedia: “Press TV (stylised as PRESSTV) is an Iranian state-owned news media organisation, owned by Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), that broadcasts in the English and French languages. The 24-hour channel, which has headquarters in Tehran, was launched on 8 July 2007 and was intended to compete with western English language services.”

    So basically TASS or RT, Iranian edition.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 hours ago

    Ah yes, maybe we should instead check with the news that fires their anti-Israel journalists or are getting bought out by zionists instead; they're American and privately owned, so by definition they're reliable

    Reliable even back before they were firing their anti-Israel journalists and getting bought out by zionists when they were claiming Iraq definitely 100% had WMDs

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 4 hours ago*

    You know it takes a lot of arrogance to think that /not/ being state owned is some kind of credential and even more arrogance for thinking we didn't already know press was Iranian. We knew that.

    And considering how easy it would be for the Scary Bad Guy Regime you're picturing in your head to just present totally false evidence through their news as official and irrifutable instead of just saying "hey an anonymous source has a tip, here's some context" I don't think you're dunking on anyone anyways with that one. They're not exactly trying to drop a bombshell story here.

  • source
  • parent