Seeing Blackbird fly again after all these years would be incredible. I'd love to know what NASA has planned for it.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 1 hour ago

“If you got a ton of money, maybe you can make it happen,” he told Aviation Week. “They went to the Moon, you know.”

That is SO funny.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    I mean if it's the fastest, why would it really be retired? It'd be like Michael Phelps retiring after his first gold medal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 hours ago

    They are expensive to fly and maintain and their primary purpose as a high-altitude spy plane has been taken over by satellites.

    They are still really cool, we just don't have a good use for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago) (1 child)

    NASA is researching quieter supersonic flight, and I can't help but think of how the (also Lockheed Martin) X-59-

    Loooong boi

    -has a extreme wing profile/nose, not unlike SR-71:

    Almost as long

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago (10 children)

    I guess we can put to rest the idea that the US government has successfully reverse engineered UFOs. Because if they had, there would be absolutely no need to do this if we could fly anywhere in the world in minutes or seconds and invisibly.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago (6 children)

    UFOs are most likely manmade, or probably something other-dimensional like angels or demons. The distances in space are too vast for visitors, the idea breaks down in more than one way once you dig into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 38 minutes ago (1 child)

    I'm enjoying this - "We've learned enough science now that we realize it's more likely fantasy creatures would be visiting us than that technologically advanced sentients would be traveling interstellar distances to visit."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (2 children)

    We have no way of knowing if they've overcome the obstacle of traveling long distances in space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 53 minutes ago (1 child)

    Yeah but why would they do it to come here? I mean, gestures vaguely at everything

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 37 minutes ago

    Also, if they were billions of light years away and they looked at our planet from afar, they would see our planet billions of years ago. No reason to visit. What are the chances of a random visit?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    Who cares why - this plane is so fucking awesome it’s an end unto itself.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 7 hours ago

    Guy at NASA:

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    Perhaps NASA is doing it to make a trophy that might impress the imbecile emperor in hopes of securing funding for space science.

    Like in Rainbow Mars when the Time Travel Bureau has to go on safari to capture extinct pets for their imbecile emperor.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

    The reason they got rid of surveillance jets is that satellites can do it without any risk to a pilot and on a 24 hr basis.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    To test against the SR-72.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›