top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 79 points 5 days ago (20 children)

Well back in the day it'd be every important officer plus the captain. So that's progress I suppose.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 5 days ago (19 children)

    That was one of the first major difference in operations that I noticed when I started TNG; the captain almost never goes on away missions. In TOS, the captain almost always led the away party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 days ago (13 children)

    Considering there were only three members of the main cast, TOS had to use their stars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 5 days ago (10 children)

    there were only three members of the main cast

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago

    That's just alpha shift. We only ever see Star Trek shows from their viewpoint (with some episodes and lower decks as exceptions). AFAIK there's three or four shifts on board those vessels?

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 5 days ago (13 children)

    Well, at least we know they will return. Imagine the transporter was full of uncredited redshirts...

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Tasha Yarr would like a word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 days ago (6 children)

    The Transporter has a pattern buffer. Why didn't they just keep copying one Redshirt guy to save lives. Like Mickey 17.

    "Time for an away mission Redshirt."

    But they don't tell him where, and then put him in the buffer. He will just, always be ready.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    "Hey now, they didn't send Troi down! She'll be able to do something to help on the ship... probably."

    "The away mission is to save Troi."

    "Well shit."


    Given that the transporter guy is still wearing the first version of the uniform, it's safe to assume that the Enterprise's yet-undiscovered MVP, Miles O'Brien is still on board. He'll be able to fix whatever pops up in the absence of the senior staff.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 4 days ago

    Honestly that’s one of the reasons I like Lower Decks. The bridge crew is all “fuck that, we got peons… I’ll just go manage some of them”

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    I mean, there were clearly only 20, maybe 30 people on the ship. So it makes sense.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Amateur. Kirk would also go himself.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    Picard will be fine manning the ship alone.

    Remember the Star Gazer and Wolf 359?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 5 days ago (16 children)

    How many officers died during those dangerous missions? Maybe this decision isn't that stupid?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 22 points 5 days ago (5 children)

    It reminds me of when I send my A-team on a mission in XCOM: it's devastating if they die, but they're also the ones most likely to succeed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago

    XCOM A-Team in theory: They're the best, they can solve any problem.

    XCOM A-Team in practice: It's March and we just spotted a Snakeman on this terror mission so our soldiers will spend their remaining time units running back to the Skyranger while screaming like little girls.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    We want to ensure maximum chaos should something go wrong

    I was sure that title was going to be about contemporary politics.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 days ago* (6 children)

    Contributes to my theory that Star Trek is in reality an existentialist dystopia with everyone on the Enterprise competing to get onboard for the chance at a meaningful death.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 5 days ago* (2 children)

    Yeah, but when a red shirt dies in TNG, it's a more impactful loss since red shirts went from "expendable nobody" to "commanding officers."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 8 points 5 days ago

    Well yeah, have you seen how small their budget for extras is???

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›