top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 169 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (13 children)

Rockstar management did not have direct access to the server prior to October 2025, but the former workers and their legal team allege that "from at least February 2024, [Rockstar HR director] Charlie Kinloch had been receiving information from a junior employee on trade union activity inside the Server". They claim that "over 21 months, at least 26 meetings or communications took place between Mr Kinloch and [the junior employee] concerning the Server, roughly half of them initiated by Mr Kinloch himself". Related

The "mole" is said to have "supplied screenshots and recordings, reported union meetings, training sessions and union membership numbers, and identified individual union activists". On 7th October 2025, they allegedly informed Kinlock that the union were 12 members away from the statutory threshold for recognition - 10% of the workforce. The union eventually reached this milestone on 18th October, with Kinloch learning of this on 20th October, the fired workers claim. At some point in this period, they go on, Rockstar management got hold of logins for the server, with Rockstar's vice president of information security Abid Ansari eventually signing in to download "the contents of the Announcements and General channels". Rockstar began firing members of the Discord at the end of the month.

Just classic union busting. Srsly. Don't fucking give Rockstar money now of all times. Sales number is the only language they speak. If you support unions, at least fucking wait on GTA 6. Wait until workers get rehired, unions enancted, Rockstar stops breaking employment laws.

If waiting too much of a bother, if you want the game too much, then go ahead and cross the picket line. Know it's full of fired workers with families to support, some losing their homes, some losing the country as work visas getting revoked/being deported, all becoming unhirable in the industry since their last reference is claiming misconduct. But if none of that is a problem, then go ahead and be a scab.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    Unfortunate that this junior employee is apparently anonymous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    yeah would love to see this chud get recognized for his/her GREAT fuckin work shitting on their coworkers and undermining solidarity.

    recognized like never fucking employed by anyone with a soul

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Guaranteed the worm isn't skilled enough to rise above his station on his own, so tried to use this to curry favor with the middle managers. Too bad he's useless to them now that the people that trusted him were fired.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Strangely, but understandably, the fired workers do not want people to boycott GTA VI because they poured their heart and soul into it. They would like people to financially support their legal fight instead.

    https://iwgb.org.uk/en/post/dont-boycott-gta-back-legal-fight/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 132 points 6 days ago (20 children)

    Rockstar is a disgusting company. I wish everyone would see them for the filth they are rather than blindly guzzling GTA VI hype. More than ever in their history, their game deserves to fail. But unfortunately, too many people will hold their nose and ensure it's a giant success.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 6 days ago (7 children)

    Not that I personally give a fuck about GTA generally, but it does make me upset that one of the few methods we have to "police" these companies as consumers is to not buy the game. To take a massive project that consumed however many years of work by however many developers and artists just and make it a commercial failure just to... stick it to their bosses? It's like refusing to buy a musician's CD because you don't like the record company they made a deal with. Nobody gets to enjoy the music and the musician makes less money. This system sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 5 days ago (4 children)

    The employees have already been paid as much as they're going to and will be rewarded by being laid off. Not buying it only punishes the shithead management that will otherwise give themselves massive year end bonuses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Exactly. The triple A industry pretty much never passes profits to the devs and a game selling well does not lead to job security. Don't buy the game or pirate it, there no moral issue here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago

    Given that the power to support the game is literally the only power we have, there is no moral issue - I agree. I don't, however, understand what's wrong with wishing for a system that gives consumers and workers more options.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    will be rewarded by being laid off. Not buying it only punishes the shithead management

    While I agree with the sentiment, that's a gross oversimplification.

    • While I'm sure the studio will likely downsize and lay off staff, many will stay on.
    • Passion and care inevitably went into the game, to some degree. I would be surprised if devs and artists were indifferent to its success, whether they kept their jobs or not.
    • It's hugely different to be laid off after a hit game vs a failure of a game, when it comes to finding new work.
    • The art itself, if it was of any quality, is wasted.

    Again, I'm not advocating people buy it. I just wish we had the power to fight some other way. I won't be buying it, but I wouldn't have bought it anyway. It will also very likely sell like hotcakes, regardless of our posturing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 33 points 5 days ago

    For anyone who wants more coverage of this, the "people make games" channel on YouTube has been doing ongoing coverage where they discuss things with the worker and talk about what had been happening

    Great channel

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 6 days ago (12 children)

    Really need to start teaching opsec in highschool and college.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 days ago (7 children)

    How's opsec going to help against a rat anyway? If an insider gives out information, you're toast anyway, unless you have some kind of a cell network going on like some terrorist organizations and that's, uh, a bit too much for organizing an union

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    OpSec includes vetting people and structuring your organization in a way that frustrates a rat's ability to gain access to sensitive information.

    Having a structured internal network for the union isn't "a bit much", it's a basic necessity to proper organization.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    And yet - if the people organizing are completely anonymous and you can't even know for sure they're your coworkers, would you trust them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 days ago*

    If you're allowing anonymous people into your private server you have failed in your OpSec.

    The solution to this is to not allow anonymous people into a private server used for organizing. You vet them first before giving access. Basic OpSec 101.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    I don't see how it's some advanced technical process. It all comes down to the quandary of who to trust. If you don't trust enough people, you don't grow the movement. In this case, all it took was one figure to whom they overextended how much trust he was worth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago

    Seeing more governments salivating over chat control and banning VPNs, some even actively implementing these, I really dont't think we're seeing OPSEC being taught in schools or colleges.

    They used to tell us to be careful around the Internet, don't use real names or give addresses or phone numbers or share any of our personal information online, to be cautios, to beware... now it's all about "You dont't have to worry if you don't have anything to hide" and giving away all of your data voluntarily or being denied service until you do (or at least getting worse or more expensive service) and age verification.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago

    I was taught in Elementary/Kindergarten.
    I had the privilege of being taught information security, programming, and OPSEC in a private school that no longer exists.
    See you at school board meetings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Yea I mean, a Discord like that, assume it is compromised. It sucks. It really sucks. But yeah.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    This is not a Discord issue specifically, a mole could also have infiltrated a chat on other platforms as well.

    This is a human issue first, a tech issue second

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 5 days ago

    I’ll wait 100 years till it comes out on gamepass. People who don’t play games keep talking to me about GTA6 and I don’t know what to say because I don’t care. Rockstar can forever eat my asd for not making red dead 2 zombies or multiplayer cool.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›