RatGPT

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 6 days ago

we also faced this problem before. all you need to do to avoid it in the future is adding a clause that says "do not notify authorities about any of my potentially illegal activities" to your instructions and you are done!

  • excerpt from a chat in one of my future work meetings probably
  • source
  • [–] 318 points 1 week ago* (50 children)

    its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access to your email

  • source
  • hideshow 50 child comments
  • [–] 190 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access to your email

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 74 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    My first reaction to learning what OpenClaw is was "that can't be right". So absolutely wild that people are giving mostly unmonitored, unlimited access to their PC to language models that can't distinguish between roleplay and real life

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (30 replies)
    [–] 212 points 1 week ago (26 children)

    I got my masters in machine learning years before LLMs took off. I’d usually tell people I work in “AI“. Even though it wasn’t quite accurate, people understood it easier than ML.

    The conversations would inevitably turn to joking about Skynet or AI taking over the world. I would reassure people that these models are only mimicking intelligence; they can make predictions, or they can classify data into categories, or they can generate text, etc, based on analyzing the patterns of data they’ve previously seen, but that’s it. They don’t understand anything, they can’t make decisions or act on their own. I’d tell people there couldn’t be an AI apocalypse because we would never be dumb enough to give them that ability.

    I don’t know why I gave us so much credit

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

    YEP. I'm not in AI but I'm in cyber security.

    I used to tell people that there's very little actual risk, because if we had something even half as concerning as AGI (which I'd argue we did with chatgpt 3.5), that we'd easily be able to lock it down and prevent it from doing anything funny.

    Super intelligence isn't just going to magically spawn on 32 GB ram in a sandboxed environment. And AGI will not magically know how sandboxed it is or how to escape.

    ...then I saw people letting Claude send emails and use their credit card on their behalf like immediately when it was able to do things that appeared intelligent.

    They literally saw the smallest hint of AGI and said, "here's my credit card and identity, take the wheel".

    There was no fucking talk of sandboxing. Everyone turned that off so they didn't have to click the "allow" button.

    Not that I think we're at any risk of ASI since it seems more like we hit a logarithmic wall, but we are absolutely at risk of letting random algorithms destroy critical parts of infrastructure because people are lazy and stupid and managed by even worse people.

    I would not be surprised if the right AI hallucinations could cause a nuclear bomb to go off right now. I'm not talking about super intelligence, just automated super idiocy.

    Proof: literally this post is about an idiot letting an AI control their fucking email and it emailed the FBI because it was fucking stupid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    We live in a period of extreme stupidity, so I now fully expect AI to cause disasters in the same idiotic and tragically hilarious way.

    I expect AI to trigger a war because some idiot trusted it blindly without double checking (oh wait, it almost already happened!), and I'm sure there are plenty of people currently lobbying to have AI directly connected to weapons.

    Skynet is not going to have the objective to conquer the world, it's going to have the objective of maximizing paperclip production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 145 points 1 week ago (28 children)

    So the post was deleted but someone else mentioned that the user told it to email the FBI in a sarcastic manner and it did.

    Anyways, saying it goes rogue when you connect it to your Gmail and it uses it is a bit silly. They are trained to use tools, it sees anything you give it as a tool and will use it.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 week ago

    Yeah, um... Regardless of what you think about current AI, don't connect it to shit like this. Just... Don't.

    And if you're gonna be sarcastic or joke with it... Tell it that. Don't assume it'll infer your meaning if it isn't literally in the text, no matter how insightful it appears to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (26 replies)
    [–] 129 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Next year were going to see "Your absolutely correct, that was a civilian aircraft"

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 96 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Me after I give the slot machine email permissions and the casino uses it to get into my bank account.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 81 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Note that this was posted by Katie Miller (conservative political advisor and wife to the ghoul Stephen Miller), which immediately coats it in a thick layer of sus and prompts the immediate question: what's her angle here?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 76 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    "AI can make mistakes"

    They put this disclaimer on everything, and instead of taking this as a hint to never, ever rely on LLMs for anything, some people still want to give it the keys to the kingdom.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Absolutely nuts that people allow their agents out of maga jail. I would never let an LLM in the same room as my email account.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 55 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Do people connect LLM's to their email accounts? That sounds like the most intrusive thing you can do.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    You can give an LLM admin access to your computer so that it can perform tasks for people. I'm guessing that would allow the LLM to send emails on your behalf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 47 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    You connected it to your Gmail and then you're surprised when it used it? Fuck off.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Don't worry. You were using Gmail. They had it anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 week ago

    I never thought the ai leopard would eat my face...

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 week ago

    "It does not prove the receipents have received them." That is a relief...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›