RatGPT
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 318 points 1 week ago* (50 children)

its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access to your email

  • source
  • hideshow 50 child comments
  • [–] 190 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access to your email

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access to your email

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    its absolutely wild to give an LLM write access to your email

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Depends what it is. A test system wouldn't be a concern to give it write access. If its not logged into any of my accounts I would even be happy to give it internet access, not to anything else on my LAN though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    And then it decides it needs prod access

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    It doesn't need to know what is actually prod or test

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    My first reaction to learning what OpenClaw is was "that can't be right". So absolutely wild that people are giving mostly unmonitored, unlimited access to their PC to language models that can't distinguish between roleplay and real life

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Neither can over 30% of humans.

    Where do you all live where humanity proves itself and isn’t dumber than a box of llms?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Hi! I work in a factory. I would trust every one of the incompetent children left behind that keep the door revolving with my machines over an LLM every time. A human can learn, an LLM can't. If a human fucks up, they do it in a way I can anticipate and account for, and when I tell them what they fucked up, they usually don't do it again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (5 children)

    For a work email connected to a work LLM, where you don't particularly care about the privacy implications, LLMs are objectively vastly superior to built-in email search functionality. Especially Outlook.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Really? That's a surprising find. Bcz all of the search features I used to use got significantly worse once LLMs were introduced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (24 replies)